[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Build Emacs without Lisp?

From: Pascal J. Bourguignon
Subject: Re: Build Emacs without Lisp?
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 20:01:55 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Rusi <address@hidden> writes:

> On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 5:50:15 PM UTC+5:30, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> >> My questions are:
>> >>
>> >>   - Is it possible to build emacs without Lisp? If so, how?
>> >>
>> >>   - Are there other work arounds available for the seg fault?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Taking your subject line literally (ie not the usual way its done today
>> > to suggest emacs = gnu-emacs)
>> > have you seen this list of 'smaller' emacsen: 
>> >
>> Thanks, that's a good point. I'm so used to emacs, I grab it with no thought.
>> Maybe an emacs knock-off is a better solution until we get a working
>> debugger to investigate the issue.
> My first encounter with emacs was 25 years ago -- jove -- pure C
> [Not counting edwin -- pure scheme -- around the same time]
> I'd be surprised if that stuff worked today... 
> IOW How much of that list is current... Dunno

edwin still works very nicely; it's distributed with mit-scheme.

__Pascal Bourguignon__       
“The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a
dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to
keep the man from touching the equipment.” -- Carl Bass CEO Autodesk

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]