gzz-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gzz-commits] gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Paper paper.tex


From: Tuomas J. Lukka
Subject: [Gzz-commits] gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Paper paper.tex
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 06:56:53 -0500

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    gzz
Changes by:     Tuomas J. Lukka <address@hidden>        02/12/01 06:56:53

Modified files:
        Documentation/Manuscripts/Paper: paper.tex 

Log message:
        twid

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex.diff?tr1=1.166&tr2=1.167&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex
diff -u gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.166 
gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.167
--- gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.166 Sun Dec  1 06:56:11 2002
+++ gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex       Sun Dec  1 06:56:53 2002
@@ -384,10 +384,11 @@
 \begin{itemize}
 \item A feature vector for a given texture should always be the
     same.
-    A non-repeating texture will always have slightly different
-    regions which result in slightly different vectors even 
-    if the local structure is the same; 
-    a repeating texture should be easier to recognize.
+    Fragments of 
+    a non-repeating texture will be slightly different,
+    resulting in slightly different vectors even 
+    if the local structure is the same.
+    A repeating texture should be easier to recognize.
     Our anecdotal observations confirm this.
 % XXX: Why wouldn't it always be the same?
 % - seeing different parts of the texture?




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]