gomp-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gomp-discuss] The primitives


From: Biagio Lucini
Subject: Re: [Gomp-discuss] The primitives
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 11:42:26 +0000 (GMT)

On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Lars Segerlund wrote:

> 
>   The reason I thought we wouldn't need a lib is that I thought we could 
> generate native calls to the thread library of choice, since most 
> mechanisms we need are supported in fx. linux threads.
> 
>   I have since silently given in to the notion of a lib ( only to come 
> back with vengence later ha ha ha ... ;-)  )
> 

You might be right, but if as we say the long term objective is
concurrency, probably we are better off by having libraries and calling
the appropriate ones when needed.

Biagio





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]