[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU copyright assignment
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU copyright assignment |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:22:26 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:48:00AM -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> I would be willing to assign my copyright, but I don't think it's a
> great idea. It seems to be largely unrelated to the problem of getting
> the patches flowing.
If copyright assignment is what Tom wants (and I agree with it), then it
would be really dumb to "get the patches flowing" without thinking about
assignments -- they're not that big of a problem if you manage them from the
start, but become an utter nightmare if you just avoid the problem until
later.
-Miles
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU copyright assignment, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU copyright assignment, James Blackwell, 2004/10/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU copyright assignment, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/10/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU copyright assignment, James Blackwell, 2004/10/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU copyright assignment, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/10/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU copyright assignment, Johannes Berg, 2004/10/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU copyright assignment, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/10/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU copyright assignment, Thomas Lord, 2004/10/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU copyright assignment, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/10/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU copyright assignment, Thomas Lord, 2004/10/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU copyright assignment, Aaron Bentley, 2004/10/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU copyright assignment,
Miles Bader <=