[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft)
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft) |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Oct 2004 19:41:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 03:11:47PM -0700, Thomas Lord wrote:
> ** The Solution: Cascade Branches
>
> There is a simple and elegant solution to the problem with
> long term branches and that is to use "cascade branches",
> as illustrated in ./cascade.ps.
On reflection, this is just a prism structure under a different name,
plus a rule that there must be a single line of ancestry through all
of them (which is actually useless and should be ignored - this isn't
used for anything, so regular freeform prism structure will work just
the same; the freeform structure is just a set of 'cascades' anyway).
This is what we've been doing for years, nothing to see here, move
along...
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft),
Andrew Suffield <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Thomas Lord, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Aaron Bentley, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Andrew Suffield, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Thomas Lord, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Aaron Bentley, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Thomas Lord, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Thomas Lord, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Aaron Bentley, 2004/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Andrew Suffield, 2004/10/04