Re: [Dragora-members] Relation of Qi and Qire

[Matias Fonzo]

El 2020-06-05 09:44, Michael Siegel escribió:
> Am 04.06.20 um 20:40 schrieb Kevin "The Nuclear" Bloom:
> > I partly agree with this line of thought: why have 2 interfaces for 
> > the
> > same command? There really is only 1 reason for such a thing:
> > easy-of-use. Instead of folks trying to remember if they're to use Qi 
> > or
> > Qire, they can just use Qire since that's how most people will be
> > working with packages (if they choose to use remote repos, of course).
>
> My idea is basically the same, only that I'd suggest users simply 
> always
> use Qi.

I think it could be done as long as Qi can call those extensions 
externally, since they are files written in Scheme/Scheme dialect.

Ideally the package manager is based ALL on Scheme, the bad thing is 
that imposing Scheme for the bootstrap does not seem to be good idea...