consensus
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU/consensus] [RFC][SH] User Data Manifesto


From: Frank Karlitschek
Subject: Re: [GNU/consensus] [RFC][SH] User Data Manifesto
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 12:20:57 +0100

Hi Richard,

thanks again for your comments. This all makes a lot of sense to me.

Perhaps it would be good to start to work on version 2 of the user data 
manifesto together.

What would be the best way to do that? I could setup a git repository 
somewhere. Does this work for everybody?


Frank



On 08.01.2013, at 21:37, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:

>    But let's switch to "private" instead of "owning" if this are better words.
> 
> I suggest using "control": users should have control of the data they
> put into the system.  "Control" is more general than "private".
> 
> Making data private is one way you can _use_ your control.
> However, you can also use your control to allow some people
> to have access to the data.
> 
>> Not all services are SaaS.  If it doesn't do _the user's own computing_
>> then it isn't SaaS.
> 
>    I read you document and I see what you mean.
>    Should we add a paragraph that SaaS is not recommended?
> 
> I suggest that we state the two problems that use of network services
> can cause:
> 
> * Losing control of your data.
> 
> * Losing control of how your computing is done (SaaS).
> 
> -- 
> Dr Richard Stallman
> President, Free Software Foundation
> 51 Franklin St
> Boston MA 02110
> USA
> www.fsf.org  www.gnu.org
> Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
>  Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]