[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?
From: |
Peter Busser |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander? |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:31:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Hi!
> Chicken is an optimizing batch compiler for the R5RS Scheme language.
> It produces portable, efficient C supporting tail recursion, first-class
> continuations, and lightweight threads. Interfacing to and from C is
> emphasized, including both static and dynamic loading of Chicken code,
> with full support for Posix functions. Chicken's interpreter is not
> strongly performant, but does provide strong debugging facilities.
> Chicken also has a repository with hundreds of user-contributed "eggs",
> including most SRFIs and many other widely available Scheme libraries.
>
> Comments?
So what can an optimizing buzzword-compliant batch compiler for the R5RS
Scheme language do for me to make my life better/easier/more exciting/etc.?
Groetjes,
Peter.
- [Chicken-users] Debian slander?, Robin Lee Powell, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] Debian slander?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] Debian slander?, Peter Busser, 2007/12/19
- [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Tobia Conforto, 2007/12/20
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, felix winkelmann, 2007/12/20
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, felix winkelmann, 2007/12/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Zbigniew, 2007/12/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Peter Busser, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Peter Busser, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Ivan Raikov, 2007/12/27