[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:23:47 +0100 |
On Dec 20, 2007 11:50 AM, Tobia Conforto <address@hidden> wrote:
> Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > http://packages.debian.org/sid/chicken-bin
> >
> > It certainly seems production quality and decently performant to me;
> > does the Chicken community still agree with the statements there?
>
> I find them biased and misleading. Those statements, coupled with the
> maintainer's laziness in updating the packages, are probably turning
> quite a few people away from Chicken. Either he is acting in bad faith,
> or he's lost interest in it. In any case I would welcome a change.
>
I actually contacted the maintainer a while ago asking for a change
of the description - AFAIK he wanted to do that but perhaps he forgot.
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-users] Debian slander?, Robin Lee Powell, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] Debian slander?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] Debian slander?, Peter Busser, 2007/12/19
- [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Tobia Conforto, 2007/12/20
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?,
felix winkelmann <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, felix winkelmann, 2007/12/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Zbigniew, 2007/12/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Peter Busser, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/27