[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:22:24 +0000 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On
> Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 7:58 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches
>
> >The FSF only allows changes of 10 lines or less in a patch, if there
> >is no copyright assignment on file.
>
> I thought with the recent changes, adding a new AVR device is merely
> going to be a one-liner (a change to avr-devices.c)?
Sure, it's now easier to add devices. But device support also needs the I/O
header file in avr-libc, and no one else can submit that except Atmel.
Eric
- [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Adam Seychell, 2012/10/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Weddington, Eric, 2012/10/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Georg-Johann Lay, 2012/10/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Joerg Wunsch, 2012/10/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Praveen, Vidya, 2012/10/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Weddington, Eric, 2012/10/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, David Brown, 2012/10/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Weddington, Eric, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Joerg Wunsch, 2012/10/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Georg-Johann Lay, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Weddington, Eric, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Weddington, Eric, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Joerg Wunsch, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Weddington, Eric, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Joerg Wunsch, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Georg-Johann Lay, 2012/10/17