[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 19:58:55 +0200 (MET DST) |
"Weddington, Eric" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Sure, it's now easier to add devices. But device support also needs
> the I/O header file in avr-libc, and no one else can submit that
> except Atmel.
I think anyone can submit it ;) (because it could be created even
based on the datasheet), but that doesn't matter much anyway, because
avr-libc doesn't insist on a copyright assignment.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, (continued)
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Joerg Wunsch, 2012/10/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Weddington, Eric, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Georg-Johann Lay, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Weddington, Eric, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Weddington, Eric, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Joerg Wunsch, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Weddington, Eric, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Georg-Johann Lay, 2012/10/17