www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point....


From: Dora Scilipoti
Subject: www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point....
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:44:13 +0000

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Dora Scilipoti <dora>   12/12/30 14:44:13

Modified files:
        philosophy/po  : open-source-misses-the-point.es.po 

Log message:
        Unfuzz.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.48&r2=1.49

Patches:
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.48
retrieving revision 1.49
diff -u -b -r1.48 -r1.49
--- open-source-misses-the-point.es.po  30 Dec 2012 09:28:05 -0000      1.48
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.es.po  30 Dec 2012 14:44:12 -0000      1.49
@@ -3,22 +3,22 @@
 # This file is distributed under the same license as the gnu.org article
 # Quiliro Ordóñez <quiliro>, 2008.
 # Xavier Reina <address@hidden>, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012.
-# Dora Scilipoti <dora AT gnu DOT org>
+# Dora Scilipoti <dora AT gnu DOT org>, 2012.
 # This translation needs further review.
 #
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
-"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.es\n"
+"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
 "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-30 04:25-0500\n"
-"PO-Revision-Date: 2012-12-30 07:18+0100\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-30 15:33+0100\n"
+"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
 "Last-Translator: Dora Scilipoti <dora AT gnu DOT org>\n"
 "Language-Team: Spanish <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language: es\n"
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
-"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
+"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"Outdated-Since: 2012-12-30 04:25-0500\n"
+"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n!=1);\n"
 
 # type: Content of: <title>
 #. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
 "estas libertades aumenta a medida que nuestra cultura y nuestras actividades "
 "cotidianas se vinculan cada vez más con el mundo digital. En un mundo de "
 "sonidos, imágenes y palabras digitales, el software libre se vuelve cada vez 
"
-"más esencial para la libertad en general. "
+"más esencial para la libertad en general."
 
 # type: Content of: <p>
 #. type: Content of: <p>
@@ -163,40 +163,6 @@
 "llegaron al movimiento después de entonces y lo asocian del mismo modo."
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
-# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of
-# | free software.  As far as we know, all existing free software would
-# | qualify as open source.  Nearly all open source software is free software,
-# | but there are exceptions.  First, some open source licenses are too
-# | restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.  Fortunately those
-# | licenses are not used on many programs.  Second, and more importantly,
-# | many computers (including many Android devices)  contain executable
-# | programs that correspond to free software source code, but the devices do
-# | not allow the user to install modified versions of those executables, but
-# | one special company has the power to do [-so modify them.-] {+so.+}  We
-# | call these devices &ldquo;tyrants&rdquo;, and the practice is called
-# | &ldquo;tivoization&rdquo; after the product where we first saw the
-# | practice.  These executables are not free software even though their
-# | source code is free software.  The open source supporters do not concern
-# | themselves with this issue; their concern is limited to the license of the
-# | source code.
-#, fuzzy
-#| msgid ""
-#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
-#| "of free software.  As far as we know, all existing free software would "
-#| "qualify as open source.  Nearly all open source software is free "
-#| "software, but there are exceptions.  First, some open source licenses are "
-#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.  Fortunately "
-#| "those licenses are not used on many programs.  Second, and more "
-#| "importantly, many computers (including many Android devices)  contain "
-#| "executable programs that correspond to free software source code, but the "
-#| "devices do not allow the user to install modified versions of those "
-#| "executables, but one special company has the power to do so modify them.  "
-#| "We call these devices &ldquo;tyrants&rdquo;, and the practice is called "
-#| "&ldquo;tivoization&rdquo; after the product where we first saw the "
-#| "practice.  These executables are not free software even though their "
-#| "source code is free software.  The open source supporters do not concern "
-#| "themselves with this issue; their concern is limited to the license of "
-#| "the source code."
 msgid ""
 "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
 "free software.  As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]