[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: criteria for version 1.0
From: |
Jason Stover |
Subject: |
Re: criteria for version 1.0 |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:57:45 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 07:10:26AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Jason Stover <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 06:36:54AM +0800, John Darrington wrote:
> >> That article by Andy Choens reminded me of another point.
> >>
> >> It would be really good if 1.0 came with a good user tutorial.
> >> Unfortunately, I really don't know where we're going to find someone
> >> to write it.
> >
> > The wiki?
>
> I don't understand. How does the wiki help us find someone to
> write a tutorial? Or is the wiki somehow a tutorial?
I was thinking that if someone started writing a tutorial on the wiki,
others could contribute, thereby reducing the workload for each
contributor to a level low enough that we would have a good tutorial
quickly.
-Jason
Re: criteria for version 1.0, Ben Pfaff, 2008/10/16
- Re: Re: criteria for version 1.0, unknown-1, 2008/10/25
- Re: criteria for version 1.0, Ben Pfaff, 2008/10/25
- Re: criteria for version 1.0, unknown-1, 2008/10/25
- Re: criteria for version 1.0, Ben Pfaff, 2008/10/25
- Re: criteria for version 1.0, unknown-1, 2008/10/25
- Re: criteria for version 1.0, Ben Pfaff, 2008/10/25
- Re: criteria for version 1.0, unknown-1, 2008/10/26
- Re: criteria for version 1.0, unknown-1, 2008/10/26
- Re: criteria for version 1.0, Ben Pfaff, 2008/10/26