Re: [Protux-devel] Undo

[rsff]

Wait,

Now a question: Is it possible to implement BOTH engines? And then make
some actions (such as cutting and pasting, moving, applying
realtime-filters, and stuff) use the action/anti-action paradigm right,
while others (the other kinds of filters, and stuff) which use the
Memory Image approach. Is that viable? Is it reasonable to think like
this?

Fabio.

Em Qua, 2004-05-05 às 07:29, Remon Sijrier escreveu:
> > ohoh ... this seems to be a very, very difficult decision, since, just as
> > Fabio said, having undo after re-starting protux seems to be important
> > AS_WELL_AS a good performance when un-doing actions!! and having both,
> > seems to be NOT POSSIBLE, right?
> 
> I do not have much experience in using audio application but not having undo 
> after restarting applications is one of the most annoying things on using an 
> application IMHO.
> The other one is bad undo performance ;-)
> 
> So, if it can be possible to have both, I vote for it!
> 
> Just a note, destructive editing is always undoable (rendering a Song with 
> filters set for example) when not using the memory Image approach, isn't it?
> 
> If I know Luciano enough, he goes for the action/anti action approach ;-)
> 
> Don't know if it makes sense, but the "slot" thing in Jmb, does it make this 
> approach more easy?
> 
> 
> Remon
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Protux-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/protux-devel
-- 
GPG Key 0x214A6615 at http://www.keyserver.net

signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente