[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] private key needed for sync?
From: |
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] private key needed for sync? |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Jun 2005 23:29:55 +0200 (CEST) |
In message <address@hidden> on Tue, 7 Jun 2005 13:27:10 -0700, Eric Anderson
<address@hidden> said:
ea-9BKuEh7s7G> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker writes:
ea-9BKuEh7s7G> > I'd suggest zw.matfuz.cz+marocode. The + sign
ea-9BKuEh7s7G> > doesn't conflict with anything that I know of.
ea-9BKuEh7s7G>
ea-9BKuEh7s7G> Oddly when I tried things with /'s in the selectors it
ea-9BKuEh7s7G> seemed to work, but I only tried it once so it could
ea-9BKuEh7s7G> have been an accident.
Yup, usually it works fine. By say you have a part of the branch that
looks like a mail address, like 'domain.com/address@hidden'. monotone will
probably interpret that as the combination of branch 'domain.com' and
author 'address@hidden', and thereby completely miss the intended selector.
Cheers,
Richard
-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte address@hidden
http://richard.levitte.org/
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
-- C.S. Lewis
- [Monotone-devel] private key needed for sync?, Zbynek Winkler, 2005/06/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] private key needed for sync?, Matthew A. Nicholson, 2005/06/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] private key needed for sync?, Brian Campbell, 2005/06/07
- [Monotone-devel] Large-scale usage (was: private key needed for sync?), Peter Simons, 2005/06/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Large-scale usage (was: private key needed for sync?), Nathaniel Smith, 2005/06/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Large-scale usage, Zbynek Winkler, 2005/06/10