[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] private key needed for sync?
From: |
Eric Anderson |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] private key needed for sync? |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 13:27:10 -0700 |
Matthew A. Nicholson writes:
> Insted of doing com.domain.branch I name my branches as domain.com/branch.
> It
> makes more sense to me.
We're doing the same thing: uniqueifier/project-name/project-branch
It made sure that we could tell the difference between the start of
the uniqueifier (usually domain-name, but I've also used e-mail
address), and the project and the branch. I haven't seen people put /
into a project name or branch so it seemed like a decent choice. It
also has the neat effect on Unix or checking out by default into a
set of sub directories as with the branch name.
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker writes:
> zwin> > We discussed possibly moving to a URL
> zwin> > like convention, like zw.matfuz.cz/marocode, but that hasn't
> zwin> > happend yet because the slash conflicts with the slash used in
> zwin> > the selector syntax.
>
> I'd suggest zw.matfuz.cz+marocode. The + sign doesn't conflict with
> anything that I know of.
Oddly when I tried things with /'s in the selectors it seemed to work,
but I only tried it once so it could have been an accident.
-Eric
- [Monotone-devel] private key needed for sync?, Zbynek Winkler, 2005/06/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] private key needed for sync?, Matthew A. Nicholson, 2005/06/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] private key needed for sync?, Brian Campbell, 2005/06/07
- [Monotone-devel] Large-scale usage (was: private key needed for sync?), Peter Simons, 2005/06/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Large-scale usage (was: private key needed for sync?), Nathaniel Smith, 2005/06/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Large-scale usage, Zbynek Winkler, 2005/06/10