[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev t2thtml: bug
From: |
Klaus Weide |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev t2thtml: bug |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Nov 1999 21:26:05 -0600 (CST) |
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Philip Webb wrote:
> anyway, gawk functions look a lot like C to me:
It doesn't matter that the syntax looks somewhat like C.
It isn't C. You'd practically have to compile the gawk interpreter
into lynx to make use of it. Well, at least a lage part of gawk I
assume. Starting with a regex library.
> where's the difficulty in incorporating that code in Lynx,
> within the kind of treatment paralleling frames which i have suggested?
Where's the advantage of that kind of 'incorporating'? Even if it
*were* C - it still operates on completely different data structures
in completely different ways. There would be very little code reuse.
So why should it be in the same program & address space?
Klaus
- lynx-dev t2thtml: bug, Philip Webb, 1999/11/21
- Re: lynx-dev t2thtml: bug, Hataguchi Takeshi, 1999/11/22
- Re: lynx-dev t2thtml: bug, Philip Webb, 1999/11/22
- Re: lynx-dev t2thtml: bug, Philip Webb, 1999/11/22
- Re: lynx-dev t2thtml: bug,
Klaus Weide <=
- Re: lynx-dev t2thtml: bug, Klaus Weide, 1999/11/23
- Re: lynx-dev t2thtml & t2tgrnest, Philip Webb, 1999/11/23
- Re: lynx-dev t2thtml & t2tgrnest, Klaus Weide, 1999/11/23
- Re: lynx-dev t2thtml & t2tgrnest, Doug Kaufman, 1999/11/23
- Re: lynx-dev t2thtml & t2tgrnest, Philip Webb, 1999/11/24
- Re: lynx-dev t2thtml & t2tgrnest, Doug Kaufman, 1999/11/24
Re: lynx-dev t2thtml: bug, Hataguchi Takeshi, 1999/11/23