[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Allows slurs to break at barlines. (issue 7424049)
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Allows slurs to break at barlines. (issue 7424049) |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:01:48 +0100 |
On 20 mars 2013, at 14:52, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> "address@hidden" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On 20 mars 2013, at 14:26, address@hidden wrote:
>>
>>> Yet another possibility would be \inner but that implies a hierarchy.
>>> More accurate would be \continued.
>>>
>>> https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/
>>
>> I like \interrupted
>
> I considered that but self-censored because it leads to the visual
> pairings ( ... \interrupted) and \interrupted( ... ).
>
> That is, \interrupted) talks about ) being interrupted when ) has not
> yet been seen. For \interrupted( the naming choice works better. I'd
> prefer it if we found a word that makes good sense in both
> places/directions, saving the user from dealing with a naming
> redundancy.
>
I don't completely follow what you're saying above - could you say it another
way?
Cheers,
MS
- Re: Allows slurs to break at barlines. (issue 7424049), (continued)
Re: Allows slurs to break at barlines. (issue 7424049), dak, 2013/03/20
Re: Allows slurs to break at barlines. (issue 7424049), dak, 2013/03/20
Re: Allows slurs to break at barlines. (issue 7424049), David Kastrup, 2013/03/20
Re: Allows slurs to break at barlines. (issue 7424049),
address@hidden <=
Re: Allows slurs to break at barlines. (issue 7424049), Xavier Scheuer, 2013/03/20
Re: Allows slurs to break at barlines. (issue 7424049), dak, 2013/03/20
Re: Allows slurs to break at barlines. (issue 7424049), k-ohara5a5a, 2013/03/25
Re: Allows slurs to break at barlines. (issue 7424049), k-ohara5a5a, 2013/03/26
Re: Allows slurs to break at barlines. (issue 7424049), janek . lilypond, 2013/03/27