[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: reorganize self_alignment_interface (issue 7768043)
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: reorganize self_alignment_interface (issue 7768043) |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 05:24:14 +0100 |
On 20 mars 2013, at 00:27, Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:40 PM, address@hidden
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> The main reason that I suggest this is that exceptions in the code base lead
>> to harder maintenance.
>> I am guilty of adding some from time to time (i.e. in stencil integral) but
>> I try to get rid of them as fast as possible.
>> One example in the code base that I don't like: check out line 136.
>
> In which file? line 136 of self-alignment-interface.cc from master is empty.
separation-item.cc - sorry for the omission.
>
>> Granted, whoever created it doesn't like it either from the looks of the
>> comment.
>> It makes the code harder to read, maintain and understand.
>> The worst offender by far is the metronome mark - there are so many
>> exceptions
>> concerning who its parent is that it leads to actual problems with layout in
>> certain cases.
>
> Sure, that's no good at all.
>
>> I definitely like your idea of coming up with a single function, though.
>> Perhaps try the following:
>>
>> -) always decompose axis-groups into elements (recursively if need be)
>
> What do you mean by axis-groups? 'hims' (a vector of grobs that me
> shoulld be aligned to)?
>
>> -) create a non_musical flag that, if set, weeds out all grobs where
>> non-musical is set to #t
>
> I'm not quite surehow non-musical grobs are related to alignment code.
> Do you mean that this flag would be responsible for "getting rid of
> PaperColumn parent"?
>
I'll try to propose a patch later today - it's easier to do that than
explaining with words.
Cheers,
MS