[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Freezing for 2.18
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Freezing for 2.18 |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:38:27 +0100 (CET) |
> So, to resume, I agree that a freeze is important. When the freeze
> kicks in, I'd rather that we say something like "no new big projects
> starting on date X will be part of 2.18" so that developers can plan
> out their next few months accordingly.
+1
Werner
- Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/10
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, address@hidden, 2013/03/10
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/10
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, mike, 2013/03/10
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/10
- Re: Freezing for 2.18,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/10
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/03/10
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/10
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, Janek Warchoł, 2013/03/10
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/10
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, address@hidden, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, Janek Warchoł, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, Janek Warchoł, 2013/03/11