[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the "r" in "git pull -r"
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: the "r" in "git pull -r" |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Aug 2009 16:35:48 -0600 |
On 8/9/09 4:27 PM, "John Mandereau" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Le dimanche 09 août 2009 à 16:21 -0600, Carl Sorensen a écrit :
>> Perfect! I hope I didn't mess up the translated docs too badly with my
>> recent merge.
>
> The only risk to mess up translated docs checking is in case you change
> committishes that appear as comments at the head of each file. If this
> is not clear enough in my CG addition, I'll rephrase it.
That's what I understood, and I hope I kept the most recent committish for
each of the translated docs. That was what I *intended* to do, at least.
Thanks,
Carl
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", (continued)
Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", John Mandereau, 2009/08/08
Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Carl Sorensen, 2009/08/08
Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Graham Percival, 2009/08/09
Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/10
Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Graham Percival, 2009/08/10
Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/10
Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Graham Percival, 2009/08/10
Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/10
lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/10
Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/11
Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/11