[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r"
From: |
Johannes Schindelin |
Subject: |
Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r" |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:45:00 +0200 (CEST) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) |
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Maximilian Albert wrote:
> 2009/8/11 Johannes Schindelin <address@hidden>:
>
> > It actually only gives you a "Clone/Update" button that makes sure
> > that a local clone (hardcoded to $HOME/lilypond) is up-to-date, but at
> > least it has a progress bar, and I verified that it works even on
> > Windows (what with its ridiculous insistence to put everything into
> > directories containing spaces).
>
> When I try that script, I end up with an "empty" directory (i.e., only
> the .git subdirectory is present). Running "git status" says that all
> the files in the source tree were deleted. I can thus recreate them by
> running "git reset --hard HEAD". What's happening here?
It actually worked here, twice.
But you have this wonderful output field in the GUI, what does it have to
say? I imagine that it gave you some error message or some such (probably
due to an older Git version that refuses to update the current 'master'
branch -- which has no commit yet, though).
So I would like to ask you two things: first, what was the error message
(there must have been one), and second: could you change the
git checkout -b master origin/master
to
git reset --hard origin/master
git config branch.master.remote origin
git config branch.master.merge refs/heads/master
?
Thanks,
Dscho
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", (continued)
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Graham Percival, 2009/08/09
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Graham Percival, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Graham Percival, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/10
- lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/10
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r",
Johannes Schindelin <=
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Jonathan Kulp, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/12
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/12
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/12