Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: file annotate

[Dustin Sallings]

On Mar 26, 2004, at 13:41, Stefan Monnier wrote:

> And if you check the 1.3 version instead, you get to see how archive
> cycling is annoying once more.  The `blame' should look further than 
> the
> artificial horizon imposed by the beginning of the current branch
> (i.e. it should follow continuation tags).

	1.3 wasn't changed because of archive cycling, though.  This is more 
of a limitation with the tool, I'd say.  I think what it does right now 
is fine, but there should perhaps be a ``dig deeper'' option to follow 
the next continuation.

--
Dustin Sallings