[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch |
Date: |
25 Mar 2004 18:12:16 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
> I can understand that... recently in a major API change in Pika I did
> a global s/cports/ports/ and unfortunately a few files had cports in
> the tagline and with all the modified files I missed the D and A lines
> in tla changes. However, the next patch I changed them back which
I wish there was some clever way to handle such situations better.
Obviously this is non-trivial ;-)
But maybe just something like the following: can't commit a patch that
replaces a file with a new one (unless you pas some extra "I know what I'm
doing" option). I.e. no simulatneous A and D on the same filename in the
same commit.
Similarly if I do `tla file-diffs FOO' and FOO seems to be a new file but
there is also a file FOO in the base revision, give me the diff between
those two files (which have different IDs but same filename).
Stefan
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] grokking arch, (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] grokking arch, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/03/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Miles Bader, 2004/03/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Tom Lord, 2004/03/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/03/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Charles Duffy, 2004/03/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Charles Duffy, 2004/03/25
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Miles Bader, 2004/03/24