[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch |
Date: |
25 Mar 2004 11:11:08 +0900 |
Matthew Dempsky <address@hidden> writes:
> Another comment, on slide 11, you give an example of an arch-tag line
> using an UUID. If there was more room (which I get the impression
> there's not, but *shrug*) I might have also added an example along the
> lines used inside tla.
You can lookup past flame-wars on this list for details, but UUIDs are
basically `safer' for several reasons, and embody the essential spirit
of taglines a bit more purely (they are meaningless strings, which need
only be unique).
[Along those lines, an example using which is equally random, but
different in format, e.g.:
# arch-tag: yoMomma^^^^&*&())))address@hidden
might reinforce the point.]
I think Tom uses what he does because that's what his emacs frob
happens to generate and he doesn't care enough to change it.
-Miles
--
We have met the enemy, and he is us. -- Pogo
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] grokking arch, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] grokking arch, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/03/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Tom Lord, 2004/03/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/03/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Charles Duffy, 2004/03/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Charles Duffy, 2004/03/25
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Miles Bader, 2004/03/24