fsfe-uk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fsfe-uk] An ignorant question?


From: Neil Darlow
Subject: Re: [Fsfe-uk] An ignorant question?
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:54:22 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.5.2

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On Monday 09 Jun 2003 3:33 pm, Chris Croughton wrote:
> Exactly, and that is a major area in which Free Software falls down very
> frequently.  Good functionality, crap interfaces because the programs
> are mostly designed by and for geeks who are more interested in writing
> the code than in making it easy for other people who just want to get a
> job done.  (And before people get mad, this describes me as well, my
> idea of a good interface for a program I write ususally takes all of the
> alphabet for command line switches!)

Which was one of the driving forces behind the creation of the AFSP (yes, I 
know there's still a lot of publicity material for me to write). This being 
the production of highly accessible, both physically and linguistically, 
programs provided in stable, documented and well-tested releases - usable by 
both the enterprise and average user.

> As another example, I really want a version of Visual Basic, or
> something as easy to use, for X.  I want to be able to knock up simple X
> GUI apps without having to code in all the position stuff, message loops
> etc., I want to just say "I want a button <here>" then right-click to
> get to the code for that button with whatever events it handles.  And
> before people say "If you want it then write it", the whole point is
> that if I knew enough about X programming to write it I wouldn't need
> the thing!

You might want to take a look at Glade if Gtk/Gnome applications are what 
you're after. KDevelop performs a similar function for Qt/KDE. Neither are 
turnkey application generators but they remove a lot of the drudgery.

> I'm not at all surprised that MS had such a thing, they always have been
> good at writing stuff for ordinary people to use -- VB (and don't forget
> that MS BASIC was /the/ standard BASIC for many machines for many
> years), Excel, Word, Access, several others.  The Free Software has been
> getting better, but there are many areas where it is nowhere near as
> easy to use as the proprietary alternatives.

The AFSP has, as one of its aims, the promotion of quality in Free Software 
production. A longer term aim is to secure sponsorship for the development of 
significant applications. With the GnuCash project moving towards being the 
definitive personal finance application, I would like the AFSP to undertake 
the development of an accountancy suite to give Sage and QuickBooks some
worthy competition.

Regards,
Neil Darlow M.Sc.
- -- 
ICQ: 135505456  E-Mail, Jabber and MSNM: <neil at darlow.co.uk>
Free Software and Open Standards Consultants - http://www.darlow.co.uk/
The Association of Free Software Professionals - http://www.afsp.org.uk/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+5K235XniSlMfkEgRAvJOAJ9GaIdvfxQfYus0es8ze6aVGWMPWQCdEzAO
wnAb2XCqzPpSN7O0lS+9sko=
=pNsA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]