> This is interesting. My idea is to append a class name like "long"
> to field tables having names longer that maybe 30 characters. Then
> I can use CSS to add specific styles to that table, so that it looks
> like what you describe.
>
> See the attached images for an idea of how these tables will look
> like. Note that other tables remain unaffected.
Very nice! We have to check whether this is OK as a whole;
I have implemented this in docwriter with commit
e113457 and this is
available on the site. Examples are:
I think these look OK along with the 2-column tables, because for smaller
entries, a 2 column table might be easier to read. However, for consistency,
we could also change all entries to the new definition-style list.
for
example it might look better if we drop the two-column layout
completely: I could imagine to consistently use
FOO blablablaba bla blubb bla bla blabla blablablaba bla
blubb-blubb bla bla blabla blablablaba bla blubb bla bla
blablabla blablablaba bla blubb bla bla blabla blablabla blabla
bla blubb bla bla blabla
BAR urgh slosh zip
or
FOO blablablaba bla blubb bla bla blabla blablablaba bla
blubb-blubb bla bla blabla blablablaba bla blubb bla bla
blablabla blablablaba bla blubb bla bla blabla blablabla blabla
bla blubb bla bla blabla
BAR urgh slosh zip
or
FOO blablablaba bla blubb bla bla blabla blablablaba bla
blubb-blubb bla bla blabla blablablaba bla blubb bla bla
blablabla blablablaba bla blubb bla bla blabla blablabla blabla
bla blubb bla bla blabla
BAR urgh slosh zip
or
FOO blablablaba bla blubb bla bla blabla blablablaba bla
blubb-blubb bla bla blabla blablablaba bla blubb bla bla
blablabla blablablaba bla blubb bla bla blabla blablabla blabla
bla blubb bla bla blabla
BAR urgh slosh zip
Having the field name and the description next to each other may not
be as comfortable as reading a table, or a definition-style list.
Instead, we could change all entries to a definition-style list (see above).
If I understood your suggestion correctly, the attached image is a rough
idea of how it will look. IMHO we should either retain what we have now
or change all tables to the new one.