Re: glr: include the created header

[Joel E. Denny]

On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Joel E. Denny wrote:

> On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Joel E. Denny wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Paul Eggert wrote:
> > 
> > > This all sounds OK (in that I can't simplify it much more :-) except
> > > that the names are still confusing.  "%pre-defines" sounds like
> > > predefined symbols, but then "%post-defines" would be -- what --
> > > postdefined symbols?
> > [...]
> > Would %defines-pre and %defines-post be any better to you?  That would be 
> > just as fine with me.
> 
> I guess this didn't help.  How about %before-defines and %after-defines?  
> That way, no one can read "pre-defines" and "pre-defined".

I meant:

  That way, no one can read "pre-defines" AS "pre-defined".

Joel