Re: glr: include the created header

[Akim Demaille]

Le 16 juin 06 à 18:32, Joel E. Denny a écrit :

> On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> > > > > "Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > How about if we call them both "%defines" and decide which is which
> > > depending on context?  That would match %{...%}'s behavior.
> >
> > Since we are looking for a new syntax, I would prefer to make it
> > clearer and independent of the order.  For a start, it will also help
> > make things more understandable when we have an %import feature.
>
> Although I'm not sure how %import will go, I was also concerned  
> about how
> my first patch would limit it.

The more I think about it, the more I like a simple solution which does
rely on %union to distinguish cases.  Even when we have %import we will
still be able to distinguish them.