Re: glr: include the created header

[Joel E. Denny]

On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Akim Demaille wrote:

> 
> Le 16 juin 06 à 18:29, Joel E. Denny a écrit :
> 
> > I modeled this after pre-prologue and post-prologue.  (Speaking of
> > confusing names... pre=before, post=after, but the pre-prologue and the
> > post-prologue are not before and after the prologue.  They *are* the
> > prologue, right?
> 
> Right.  pre and post were meant to say first part and last part of.
> 
> I have other sick proposals :)  How about %preamble, and %postamble?
> Or prequel and sequel :)  alpha, omega.

Are we now talking about replacing %{...%} with something more explicit, 
or just choosing different terminology for the documentation?

Joel