Re: glr: include the created header

[Joel E. Denny]

On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Joel E. Denny wrote:

> On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Akim Demaille wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Le 16 juin 06 ? 18:29, Joel E. Denny a ?crit :
> > 
> > > I modeled this after pre-prologue and post-prologue.  (Speaking of
> > > confusing names... pre=before, post=after, but the pre-prologue and the
> > > post-prologue are not before and after the prologue.  They *are* the
> > > prologue, right?
> > 
> > Right.  pre and post were meant to say first part and last part of.
> > 
> > I have other sick proposals :)  How about %preamble, and %postamble?
> > Or prequel and sequel :)  alpha, omega.
> 
> Are we now talking about replacing %{...%} with something more explicit, 
> or just choosing different terminology for the documentation?

I think I misunderstood you.  I thought you were suggesting alternatives 
for %{...%}.  Now I realize you were probably suggesting alternatives for 
my proposed %defines-pre and %defines-post.

Joel