Re: glr: include the created header

[Joel E. Denny]

On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Akim Demaille wrote:

> >>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>  > How about if we call them both "%defines" and decide which is which
>  > depending on context?  That would match %{...%}'s behavior.
> 
> Since we are looking for a new syntax, I would prefer to make it
> clearer and independent of the order.  For a start, it will also help
> make things more understandable when we have an %import feature.

Although I'm not sure how %import will go, I was also concerned about how 
my first patch would limit it.

> To gain in symmetry, we could also used pre-union and post-union?
> Bah.  Dunno.

I hate to tie it to the union since these are useful without a union.

Joel