[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xlog-discussion] RE: Hold your (xlog-) horses - suggestion

From: Tomi Manninen
Subject: Re: [Xlog-discussion] RE: Hold your (xlog-) horses - suggestion
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:02:41 +0200 (EET)

On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Stephane Fillod wrote:

> > I think we could live with making ':' an illegal character inside a
> > message. The sending program would have the resposibility for making sure
> Actualy it doesn't matter if a ':' appear in the data field, as long as
> the *field name* does not allow the ':' character.

Ah, of course. Should have thought it a bit further...

> Would it be possible to not use '\n' instead of '\1' ? 
> Some psk31 programs may want to include carriage return in the comment
> field.

Sure. It's a simple #define in my code so I'll just leave it as it is 

Tomi Manninen           Internet:  address@hidden
OH2BNS                  AX.25:     address@hidden
KP20ME04                Amprnet:   address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]