[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xlog-discussion] RE: Hold your (xlog-) horses - suggestion

From: WILLIAMS,TED (HP-NewJersey,ex2)
Subject: [Xlog-discussion] RE: Hold your (xlog-) horses - suggestion
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:09:51 -0500

Hi Guys.

Been away for a while, but I'm back.

As for:
> version:1\1program:gmfsk\1date:17 Nov

Here is something you may want to think about for passing this data.
of passing the message data a string, why not pass it as a struct? (type
cast as 
needed)  That should make retrieving the data fields a lot easier.  

Now, who wants to convince me that the data is being passed in the right
I still prefer the log program passing the data to the app.  HI

Ted - WA0EIR

> program program name sending the message
> date abreviated date, localized or not? 
> time start time UTC 
> endtime end time UTC (mandatory in France) 
> call call sign > name operator's name 
> qth --.- - .... 
> mhz full frequency (if specified, band not required) 
> band band in meter > mode two way mode (Question: what about split?) 
> tx his report > rx my report 
> power emitted power (mandatory in France) 
> notes whatever 
> locator as used on 6m and up 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]