www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www philosophy/eldred-amicus.fr.html philosophy...


From: GNUN
Subject: www philosophy/eldred-amicus.fr.html philosophy...
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 06:36:04 -0400 (EDT)

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     21/09/04 06:36:03

Modified files:
        philosophy     : eldred-amicus.fr.html 
                         essays-and-articles.fr.html 
        philosophy/po  : eldred-amicus.fr-en.html 
                         essays-and-articles.fr-en.html 
        proprietary    : all.fr.html malware-apple.fr.html 
                         malware-microsoft.fr.html 
                         proprietary-drm.fr.html 
                         proprietary-interference.fr.html 
                         proprietary-jails.fr.html proprietary.fr.html 
        proprietary/po : all.fr-en.html malware-apple.fr-en.html 
                         malware-microsoft.fr-en.html 
                         proprietary-drm.fr-en.html 
                         proprietary-interference.fr-en.html 
                         proprietary-jails.fr-en.html 
                         proprietary.fr-en.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/eldred-amicus.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.53&r2=1.54
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/essays-and-articles.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.132&r2=1.133
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/eldred-amicus.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.32&r2=1.33
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/essays-and-articles.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.97&r2=1.98
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/all.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.25&r2=1.26
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/malware-apple.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.121&r2=1.122
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/malware-microsoft.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.118&r2=1.119
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/proprietary-drm.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.58&r2=1.59
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/proprietary-interference.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.73&r2=1.74
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/proprietary-jails.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.54&r2=1.55
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/proprietary.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.239&r2=1.240
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/all.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.21&r2=1.22
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/malware-apple.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.112&r2=1.113
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.108&r2=1.109
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-drm.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.51&r2=1.52
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-interference.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.60&r2=1.61
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-jails.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.45&r2=1.46
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.224&r2=1.225

Patches:
Index: philosophy/eldred-amicus.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/eldred-amicus.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.53
retrieving revision 1.54
diff -u -b -r1.53 -r1.54
--- philosophy/eldred-amicus.fr.html    31 May 2021 21:09:09 -0000      1.53
+++ philosophy/eldred-amicus.fr.html    4 Sep 2021 10:36:03 -0000       1.54
@@ -1,32 +1,52 @@
 <!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/eldred-amicus.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.fr.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.78 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.96 -->
+<!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html -->
+<!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays laws copyright" -->
+<!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" -->
 
 <!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
 <title>Mémoire d'amicus curiae de la FSF, Eldred v. Ashcroft - Projet GNU - 
Free
 Software Foundation</title>
-
+<style type="text/css" media="print,screen"><!--
+#content .emph-box { background: none; }
+#content h3 { text-align: center; }
+.signature { text-align: right; margin-right: 10%; }
+.signature address { display: inline-block; text-align: left; font-style: 
normal; }
+.infobox h4 { font-weight: normal; font-size: 1em; text-indent: -1em; }
+.infobox ul, .infobox ul li { margin-left: 0; margin-right: 0; }
+-->
+</style>
 <meta name="Keywords" content="GNU, FSF, Free Software Foundation, GNU, Linux, 
liberté, logiciel, pouvoir,
 droits, copyright, extension, opinion, eldred, ashcroft, mickey mouse, loi,
 disney, sonny bono, rétroactif, perpétuel" />
 
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/eldred-amicus.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.fr.html" -->
-<h2>Mémoire d'amicus curiae de la FSF, Eldred v. Ashcroft</h2>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.fr.html" -->
+<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.fr.html" -->
+<div class="article reduced-width">
+
+<h2 class="c">Mémoire d'amicus curiae de la FSF, Eldred v. Ashcroft</h2>
 
 <!--
 original version by:  Nikos Drakos, CBLU, University of Leeds
 * revised and updated by:  Marcus Hennecke, Ross Moore, Herb Swan
 * with significant contributions from:
   Jens Lippmann, Marek Rouchal, Martin Wilck and others -->
-<p>
-[ Ce texte est également disponible en anglais aux formats <a
+<div class="infobox">
+<p class="c">
+[Ce document est également disponible en anglais aux formats <a
 href="/philosophy/eldred-amicus.ps">Postscript</a> et <a
-href="/philosophy/eldred-amicus.pdf">PDF</a> ]
+href="/philosophy/eldred-amicus.pdf">PDF</a>]
 </p>
+</div>
 
-<p style="text-align:center">
+<hr class="no-display" />
+<div class="emph-box c" style="background: none">
+<p>
 No. 01-618 
 <br />
 <br /> 
@@ -60,8 +80,9 @@
 <br />  
 </p>
 
-<ul>
-<li>E<small>BEN </small>M<small>OGLEN</small> 
+<div class="signature">
+<address>
+E<small>BEN </small>M<small>OGLEN</small> 
 <br />   <i>Avocat inscrit au dossier</i>
 <br />
 435 West 116th Street 
@@ -70,12 +91,12 @@
 <br />  (212) 854-8382 <br />
 <br />
 Avocat de l'<i>amicus curiae</i>
+</address>
+</div>
+</div>
   
-</li>
-</ul>
-
-<h3 style="text-align:center"
-id="SECTION01000000000000000000">Question présentée</h3>
+<div class="emph-box">
+<h3 id="SECTION01000000000000000000">Question présentée</h3>
 
 <ol>
 <li>La Cour d'appel s'est-elle trompée en jugeant que, selon la « clause du
@@ -84,140 +105,144 @@
 indéfiniment prolonger la durée des copyrights existants en adoptant <i>in
 seriatim</i> des prolongations nominalement limitées ?</li>
 </ol>
+</div>
 
-<h4 id="SECTION02000000000000000000">Table des matières</h4>
+<div class="toc">
+<h3 id="SECTION02000000000000000000">Table des matières</h3>
 
 <!--Table of Contents-->
 <ul>
-<li><a id="tex2html16"
-href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION01000000000000000000">Question 
présentée</a></li>
-<li><a id="tex2html17"
-href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION02000000000000000000">Table des 
matières</a></li>
-<li><a id="tex2html18"
-href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION03000000000000000000">Tableau des
+<li><a id="tex2html16" href="#SECTION01000000000000000000">Question
+présentée</a></li>
+<li><a id="tex2html17" href="#SECTION02000000000000000000">Table des
+matières</a></li>
+<li><a id="tex2html18" href="#SECTION03000000000000000000">Tableau des
 autorités</a></li>
-<li><a id="tex2html19"
-href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION04000000000000000000">Intérêt de l'<i>amicus
-curiae</i></a></li>
-<li><a id="tex2html20"
-href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION05000000000000000000">Résumé de
+<li><a id="tex2html19" href="#SECTION04000000000000000000">Intérêt de
+l'<i>amicus curiae</i></a></li>
+<li><a id="tex2html20" href="#SECTION05000000000000000000">Résumé de
 l'argument</a></li>
-<li><a id="tex2html21"
-href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION06000000000000000000">Argument</a>
+<li><a id="tex2html21" href="#SECTION06000000000000000000">Argument</a>
 <ul>
-<li><a id="tex2html22" 
href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION06010000000000000000">Les
-pionniers destinaient le copyright à établir un monopole de droit sur les
-œuvres d'auteur pendant un temps strictement limité</a></li>
-<li><a id="tex2html23" href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION06020000000000000000">La
-politique historique inscrite dans la clause du copyright est absolument
-nécessaire à la réconciliation entre le monopole du copyright et le système
-de libre expression</a>
+<li><a id="tex2html22" href="#SECTION06010000000000000000">I. Les pionniers
+destinaient le copyright à établir un monopole de droit sur les œuvres
+d'auteur pendant un temps strictement limité</a></li>
+<li><a id="tex2html23" href="#SECTION06020000000000000000">II. La politique
+historique inscrite dans la clause du copyright est absolument nécessaire à
+la réconciliation entre le monopole du copyright et le système de libre
+expression</a>
 <ul>
-<li><a id="tex2html24" href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION06021000000000000000">La
-prolongation indéfinie de la durée du monopole sur les œuvres d'auteur
-existantes est incompatible avec la clause du copyright et le premier
-amendement</a></li>
-<li><a id="tex2html25" href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION06022000000000000000">Le
-cinquième amendement interdit ce genre de pratique juridique à l'égard des
-droits de propriété physique, et aucune justification constitutionnelle ne
-permet de faire avec la libre expression ce qui ne peut pas l'être avec la
-simple propriété</a></li>
+<li><a id="tex2html24" href="#SECTION06021000000000000000">A. La prolongation
+indéfinie de la durée du monopole sur les œuvres d'auteur existantes est
+incompatible avec la clause du copyright et le premier amendement</a></li>
+<li><a id="tex2html25" href="#SECTION06022000000000000000">B. Le cinquième
+amendement interdit ce genre de pratique juridique à l'égard des droits de
+propriété physique, et aucune justification constitutionnelle ne permet de
+faire avec la libre expression ce qui ne peut pas l'être avec la simple
+propriété</a></li>
 </ul>
 </li>
-<li><a id="tex2html26" 
href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION06030000000000000000">Les
-dangers spécifiques d'abus et de corruption justifient un examen
-constitutionnel rigoureux lorsqu'il s'agit de prolonger la durée des
-monopoles de droit</a></li>
+<li><a id="tex2html26" href="#SECTION06030000000000000000">III. Les dangers
+spécifiques d'abus et de corruption justifient un examen constitutionnel
+rigoureux lorsqu'il s'agit de prolonger la durée des monopoles de 
droit</a></li>
 </ul>
 </li>
-<li><a id="tex2html27"
-href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION07000000000000000000">Conclusion</a></li>
+<li><a id="tex2html27" href="#SECTION07000000000000000000">Conclusion</a></li>
 </ul>
 
 <!--End of Table of Contents-->
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="infobox c">
 <h3 id="SECTION03000000000000000000">Tableau des autorités</h3>
 
-<p>
+<div class="nocenter" style="display:inline-block">
+<h4>
 <i>Causes</i>
-</p>
+</h4>
 
-<p>
-Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919) 10 
-<br />
+<ul>
+<li>Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919) 10 
+</li><li>
 Darcy v. Allen, (The Case of Monopolies), 
 <br />
 11 Co. Rep. 84 (1603) 5 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Eldred v. Reno, 239 F.3d 372 (CADC 2001) 7, <i>passim</i> 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone 
 <br />
 Service, Co., Inc., 499 U.S. 340 (1991) 7,11,12 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Goldstein v. California, 412 U.S. 546 (1973) 12 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Harper &amp; Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation 
 <br />
 Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539 (1985) 9 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Hawaii Housing Authority v. 
 <br />
 Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229 (1984) 14 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) 10 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 
 <br />
 521 U.S. 844 (1997) 10 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 San Francisco Arts &amp; Athletics, Inc. v. 
 <br />
 United States Olympic Committee, 
 <br />
 483 U.S. 522 (1987) 9 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Schnapper v. Foley, 667 F.2d 102 (CADC 1981) 11 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Singer Mfg. Co. v. June Mfg. Co., 163 U.S. 169 (1896) 11 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Trademark Cases, 100 U.S. 82 (1879) 11 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 
 <br />
 319 U.S. 624 (1943) 10 
-</p>
+</li>
+</ul>
 
-<p>
+<h4>
 <i>Constitutions, lois et règlements</i>
-</p>
+</h4>
 
-<p>
+<ul>
+<li>
 U.S. Const. Art. I, &#167;8, cl. 8 3, <i>passim</i> 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 U.S. Const. Amend. I 7, <i>passim</i> 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 U.S. Const. Amend. V 13,14 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Copyright Act of 1709 (Statute of Anne), 
 <br />
 8 Anne, c. 19 6 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Copyright Act of 1790, 1 Stat. 124 6 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Sonny Bono Copyright Term 
 <br />
 Extension Act, Pub. L. No. 105-298, 
 <br />
 Title I, 112 Stat. 2827 3, <i>passim</i> 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Statute of Monopolies, 21 Jac. I, c. 3 5 
-</p>
+</li>
+</ul>
 
-<p>
+<h4>
 <i>Autres documents</i>
-</p>
+</h4>
 
-<p>
+<ul>
+<li>
 Yochai Benkler, Free as the Air to Common 
 <br />
 Use: First Amendment Constraints on  
@@ -225,42 +250,47 @@
 Enclosure of the Public Domain, 
 <br />
 74 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 354 (1999) 8 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 William Blackstone, Commentaries on 
 <br />
 the Laws of England (1769) 5 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 The Charter and General Laws of the Colony 
 <br />
 and Province of Massachusetts Bay (Boston, 1814) 6 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 144 Cong. Rec. H9951 (daily ed. Oct. 7, 1998) 3 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Thomas I. Emerson, The System of Freedom 
 <br />
 of Expression (1970) 9 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Max Farrand, The Records of the Federal 
 <br />
 Convention of 1787 (1937) 6 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 George Lee Haskins, Law and Authority 
 <br />
 in Early Massachusetts (1960) 6 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Melville B. Nimmer, Does Copyright Abridge 
 <br />
 the First Amendment Guaranties of Free Speech 
 <br />
 and the Press?, 17 UCLA L. Rev. 1180 (1970) 8 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Mark Rose, Authors and Owners: 
 <br />
 The Invention of Copyright (1993) 6 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Cecily Violet Wedgwood, The King's Peace (1955) 5 
-</p>
+</li>
+</ul>
+</div>
+</div>
+<hr class="no-display" />
 
+<div class="emph-box c">
 <p>
 No. 01-618 
 <br />   
@@ -294,6 +324,7 @@
 <br />   
 <br />  
 </p>
+</div>
 
 <h3 id="SECTION04000000000000000000">Intérêt de l'<i>amicus curiae</i></h3>
 
@@ -401,9 +432,9 @@
 
 <h3 id="SECTION06000000000000000000">Argument</h3>
 
-<h3 id="SECTION06010000000000000000">Les pionniers destinaient le copyright à 
établir un monopole de droit<a
+<h4 id="SECTION06010000000000000000">I. Les pionniers destinaient le copyright 
à établir un monopole de droit<a
 id="TransNote6-rev" href="#TransNote6"><sup>f</sup></a> sur les œuvres
-d'auteur pendant un temps strictement limité</h3>
+d'auteur pendant un temps strictement limité</h4>
 
 <p>
 Les mots « pour des temps limités » qui figurent dans la clause du
@@ -486,9 +517,9 @@
 domaine public) couronnées par la présente loi, qui diffère la réversion de
 chaque copyright existant à des décennies.</p>
 
-<h3 id="SECTION06020000000000000000">La politique historique inscrite dans la 
clause du copyright est absolument
-nécessaire à la réconciliation entre le monopole du copyright et le système
-de libre expression</h3>
+<h4 id="SECTION06020000000000000000">II. La politique historique inscrite dans 
la clause du copyright est
+absolument nécessaire à la réconciliation entre le monopole du copyright et
+le système de libre expression</h4>
 
 <p>
 Aussi important que soit le principe de temps limité pour modérer
@@ -598,9 +629,9 @@
 Cour d'appel a failli à son devoir de protéger les intérêts inestimables du
 système de libre expression.</p>
 
-<h4 id="SECTION06021000000000000000">La prolongation indéfinie de la durée 
du monopole sur les œuvres d'auteur
+<h5 id="SECTION06021000000000000000">A. La prolongation indéfinie de la 
durée du monopole sur les œuvres d'auteur
 existantes est incompatible avec la clause du copyright et le premier
-amendement</h4>
+amendement</h5>
 
 <p>
 Précisément parce que la création de droits exclusifs sur les expressions
@@ -676,10 +707,10 @@
 distorsion sémantique qui rend la prolongation contenue dans la CTEA
 « limitée ».</p>
 
-<h4 id="SECTION06022000000000000000">Le cinquième amendement interdit ce 
genre de pratique juridique à l'égard
+<h5 id="SECTION06022000000000000000">B. Le cinquième amendement interdit ce 
genre de pratique juridique à l'égard
 des droits de propriété physique, et aucune justification constitutionnelle
 ne permet de faire avec la libre expression ce qui ne peut pas l'être avec
-la simple propriété</h4>
+la simple propriété</h5>
 
 <p>
 Selon la logique du jugement de la Cour d'appel, apparemment appuyée dans
@@ -740,9 +771,9 @@
 de droit dont il est question ont été octroyés, si le Congrès n'était pas
 intervenu de manière anticonstitutionnelle.</p>
 
-<h3 id="SECTION06030000000000000000">Les dangers spécifiques d'abus et de 
corruption justifient un examen
+<h4 id="SECTION06030000000000000000">III. Les dangers spécifiques d'abus et 
de corruption justifient un examen
 constitutionnel rigoureux lorsqu'il s'agit de prolonger la durée des
-monopoles de droit</h3>
+monopoles de droit</h4>
 
 <p>
 Au cours du premier siècle de notre république, la durée des copyrights a
@@ -791,13 +822,11 @@
 
 <p>
 Respectueusement.
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
 </p>
 
-<ul>
-<li>E<small>BEN </small>M<small>OGLEN</small> 
+<div class="signature">
+<address>
+E<small>BEN </small>M<small>OGLEN</small> 
 <br />   <i>Avocat inscrit au dossier</i>
 <br />
 435 West 116th Street 
@@ -806,12 +835,12 @@
 <br />  (212) 854-8382 <br />
 <br />
 Avocat de l'<i>amicus curiae</i>
-</li>
-</ul>
+</address>
+</div>
 
+<div class="infobox">
 <hr />
-
-<ul>
+<ul class="no-bullet">
 <li><a id="foot151" href="#tex2html1"><sup>1</sup>  </a>Les avocats des deux
 parties ont consenti au classement de ce factum, et ces consentements ont
 été classés au greffe de cette Cour. Aucun des avocats des deux parties n'a
@@ -839,7 +868,8 @@
 en cédant au conservateur un monopole de droit valable pendant des décennies
 sur leur copie et leur redistribution.</li>
 </ul>
-
+</div>
+</div>
 
 <div class="translators-notes">
 
@@ -887,7 +917,7 @@
 
 <!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.fr.html" -->
-<div id="footer">
+<div id="footer" role="contentinfo">
 <div class="unprintable">
 
 <p>Veuillez envoyer les requêtes concernant la FSF et GNU à &lt;<a
@@ -907,7 +937,7 @@
 
         &lt;web-translators@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
 
-        <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        <p>For information on coordinating and contributing translations of
         our web pages, see <a
         href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
         README</a>. -->
@@ -953,11 +983,12 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Dernière mise à jour :
 
-$Date: 2021/05/31 21:09:09 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 10:36:03 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>
 </div>
+<!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include -->
 </body>
 </html>

Index: philosophy/essays-and-articles.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/essays-and-articles.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.132
retrieving revision 1.133
diff -u -b -r1.132 -r1.133
--- philosophy/essays-and-articles.fr.html      28 Aug 2021 17:31:57 -0000      
1.132
+++ philosophy/essays-and-articles.fr.html      4 Sep 2021 10:36:03 -0000       
1.133
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@
 
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20050729110347/http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/stallman.html";><cite>Nature
 WebDebates</cite></a> en 2001 – Cet article explique comment le copyright
 freine le progrès dans la recherche scientifique. Vous pourriez aussi être
-intéressé par la <i><a href="https://www.plos.org/";>Public Library of
+intéressé par la <i><a href="https://plos.org/";>Public Library of
 Science</a></i> (Bibliothèque scientifique publique), dont la mission est de
 mettre les recherches scientifiques à la disposition de tous, librement.</li>
  <li>
@@ -1506,7 +1506,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Dernière mise à jour :
 
-$Date: 2021/08/28 17:31:57 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 10:36:03 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: philosophy/po/eldred-amicus.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/eldred-amicus.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.32
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -b -r1.32 -r1.33
--- philosophy/po/eldred-amicus.fr-en.html      9 Dec 2020 08:02:11 -0000       
1.32
+++ philosophy/po/eldred-amicus.fr-en.html      4 Sep 2021 10:36:03 -0000       
1.33
@@ -1,27 +1,44 @@
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.78 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.96 -->
+<!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html -->
+<!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays laws copyright" -->
+<!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" -->
 <title>FSF's Brief Amicus Curiae, Eldred v. Ashcroft
 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
-
+<style type="text/css" media="print,screen"><!--
+#content .emph-box { background: none; }
+#content h3 { text-align: center; }
+.signature { text-align: right; margin-right: 10%; }
+.signature address { display: inline-block; text-align: left; font-style: 
normal; }
+.infobox h4 { font-weight: normal; font-size: 1em; text-indent: -1em; }
+.infobox ul, .infobox ul li { margin-left: 0; margin-right: 0; }
+--></style>
 <meta name="Keywords" content="GNU, FSF, Free Software Foundation, GNU, Linux, 
freedom, software, power, rights, copyright, extension, opinion, eldred, 
ashcroft, mickey mouse, law, disney, sonny bono, retroactive, perpetual" />
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/eldred-amicus.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
+<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
+<div class="article reduced-width">
 
-<h2>FSF's Brief Amicus Curiae, Eldred v. Ashcroft</h2>
-
+<h2 class="c">FSF's Brief Amicus Curiae, Eldred&nbsp;v.&nbsp;Ashcroft</h2>
 <!--
 original version by:  Nikos Drakos, CBLU, University of Leeds
 * revised and updated by:  Marcus Hennecke, Ross Moore, Herb Swan
 * with significant contributions from:
   Jens Lippmann, Marek Rouchal, Martin Wilck and others -->
 
-<p>
-[ This file is also available
+<div class="infobox">
+<p class="c">
+[This document is also available
 in <a href="/philosophy/eldred-amicus.ps">PostScript</a>
-and <a href="/philosophy/eldred-amicus.pdf">PDF</a> formats. ]
+and <a href="/philosophy/eldred-amicus.pdf">PDF</a> formats.]
 </p>
+</div>
 
-<p style="text-align:center">
+<hr class="no-display" />
+<div class="emph-box c" style="background: none">
+<p>
 No. 01-618 
 <br />
 <br /> 
@@ -55,8 +72,9 @@
 <br />  
 </p>
 
-<ul>
-<li>E<small>BEN </small>M<small>OGLEN</small> 
+<div class="signature">
+<address>
+E<small>BEN </small>M<small>OGLEN</small> 
 <br />   <i>Counsel of record</i>
 <br />
 435 West 116th Street 
@@ -65,12 +83,12 @@
 <br />  (212) 854-8382 <br />
 <br />
 Counsel for <i>Amicus Curiae</i>
+</address>
+</div>
+</div>
   
-</li>
-</ul>
-
-<h3 style="text-align:center"
-id="SECTION01000000000000000000">Question Presented</h3>
+<div class="emph-box">
+<h3 id="SECTION01000000000000000000">Question Presented</h3>
 
 <ol>
 <li>Did the Court of Appeals err in holding that, under the Copyright
@@ -78,45 +96,47 @@
 copyrights by <i>seriatim</i> adoption of nominally
 &ldquo;limited&rdquo; extensions?</li>
 </ol>
+</div>
 
-<h4 id="SECTION02000000000000000000">Contents</h4>
+<div class="toc">
+<h3 id="SECTION02000000000000000000">Contents</h3>
 <!--Table of Contents-->
 
 <ul>
 <li><a id="tex2html16"
-  href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION01000000000000000000">Question
+  href="#SECTION01000000000000000000">Question
   Presented</a></li>
 <li><a id="tex2html17"
-  href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION02000000000000000000">Contents</a></li>
+  href="#SECTION02000000000000000000">Contents</a></li>
 <li><a id="tex2html18"
-  href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION03000000000000000000">Table of
+  href="#SECTION03000000000000000000">Table of
   Authorities</a></li>
 <li><a id="tex2html19"
-  href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION04000000000000000000">Interest
+  href="#SECTION04000000000000000000">Interest
   of <i>Amicus Curiae</i></a></li>
 <li><a id="tex2html20"
-  href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION05000000000000000000">Summary of
+  href="#SECTION05000000000000000000">Summary of
   Argument</a></li>
 <li><a id="tex2html21"
-  href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION06000000000000000000">Argument</a>
+  href="#SECTION06000000000000000000">Argument</a>
 <ul>
 <li><a id="tex2html22"
-  href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION06010000000000000000">The Framers
+  href="#SECTION06010000000000000000">I. The Framers
   Intended Copyright to Be a Statutory Monopoly Awarded to Works of
   Authorship For A Strictly Limited Time</a></li>
 <li><a id="tex2html23"
-  href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION06020000000000000000">The Historical
+  href="#SECTION06020000000000000000">II. The Historical
   Policy Embodied in the Copyright Clause is Absolutely Essential to
   Reconcile the Copyright Monopoly with the System of Free
   Expression</a>
 <ul>
 <li><a id="tex2html24"
-  href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION06021000000000000000">Indefinite
+  href="#SECTION06021000000000000000">A. Indefinite
   Extension of the Term of Monopoly on Existing Works of Authorship is
   Incompatible with Both the Copyright Clause and the First
   Amendment</a></li>
 <li><a id="tex2html25"
-  href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION06022000000000000000">The Fifth
+  href="#SECTION06022000000000000000">B. The Fifth
   Amendment Prohibits Legislative Action Such as This With Respect to
   Physical Property Rights, and There Is No Constitutional
   Justification for Permitting What Cannot Be Done with Mere Property
@@ -124,99 +144,107 @@
 </ul>
 </li>
 <li><a id="tex2html26"
-  href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION06030000000000000000">Particular
+  href="#SECTION06030000000000000000">III. Particular
   Dangers of Abuse and Corruption Justify Strict Constitutional
   Scrutiny When the Term of Statutory Monopolies is Extended</a></li>
 </ul>
 </li>
 <li><a id="tex2html27"
-  href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION07000000000000000000">Conclusion</a></li>
+  href="#SECTION07000000000000000000">Conclusion</a></li>
 </ul>
 <!--End of Table of Contents-->
+</div>
 
+
+<div class="infobox c">
 <h3 id="SECTION03000000000000000000">Table of Authorities</h3>
 
-<p>
+<div class="nocenter" style="display:inline-block">
+<h4>
 <i>Cases</i>
-</p>
+</h4>
 
-<p>
-Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919) 10 
-<br />
+<ul>
+<li>Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919) 10 
+</li><li>
 Darcy v. Allen, (The Case of Monopolies), 
 <br />
 11 Co. Rep. 84 (1603) 5 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Eldred v. Reno, 239 F.3d 372 (CADC 2001) 7, <i>passim</i> 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone 
 <br />
 Service, Co., Inc., 499 U.S. 340 (1991) 7,11,12 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Goldstein v. California, 412 U.S. 546 (1973) 12 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Harper &amp; Row, Publishers, Inc.  v. Nation 
 <br />
 Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539 (1985) 9 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Hawaii Housing Authority v. 
 <br />
 Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229 (1984) 14 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) 10 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 
 <br />
 521 U.S. 844 (1997) 10 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 San Francisco Arts &amp; Athletics, Inc. v. 
 <br />
 United States Olympic Committee, 
 <br />
 483 U.S. 522 (1987) 9 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Schnapper v. Foley, 667 F.2d 102 (CADC 1981) 11 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Singer Mfg. Co. v. June Mfg. Co., 163 U.S. 169 (1896) 11 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Trademark Cases, 100 U.S. 82 (1879) 11 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 
 <br />
 319 U.S. 624 (1943) 10 
-</p>
+</li>
+</ul>
 
-<p>
+<h4>
 <i>Constitutions, Statutes, and Regulations</i>
-</p>
+</h4>
 
-<p>
+<ul>
+<li>
 U.S. Const. Art. I, &#167;8, cl.&nbsp;8 3, <i>passim</i> 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 U.S. Const. Amend. I 7, <i>passim</i> 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 U.S. Const. Amend. V 13,14 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Copyright Act of 1709 (Statute of Anne), 
 <br />
 8 Anne, c.&nbsp;19 6 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Copyright Act of 1790, 1 Stat. 124 6 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Sonny Bono Copyright Term 
 <br />
 Extension Act, Pub.&nbsp;L.&nbsp;No.&nbsp;105-298, 
 <br />
 Title I, 112 Stat. 2827 3, <i>passim</i> 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Statute of Monopolies, 21 Jac.&nbsp;I, c.&nbsp;3 5 
-</p>
+</li>
+</ul>
 
-<p>
+<h4>
 <i>Other Materials</i>
-</p>
+</h4>
 
-<p>
+<ul>
+<li>
 Yochai Benkler, Free as the Air to  Common 
 <br />
 Use: First Amendment Constraints on  
@@ -224,42 +252,47 @@
 Enclosure of the Public Domain, 
 <br />
 74 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 354 (1999) 8 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 William Blackstone, Commentaries on 
 <br />
 the Laws of England (1769) 5 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 The Charter and General Laws of the Colony 
 <br />
 and Province of Massachusetts Bay (Boston, 1814) 6 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 144 Cong. Rec. H9951 (daily ed. Oct. 7, 1998) 3 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Thomas I. Emerson, The System of Freedom 
 <br />
 of Expression (1970) 9 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Max Farrand, The Records of the Federal 
 <br />
 Convention of 1787 (1937) 6 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 George Lee Haskins, Law and Authority 
 <br />
 in Early Massachusetts (1960) 6 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Melville B. Nimmer, Does Copyright Abridge 
 <br />
 the First Amendment Guaranties of Free Speech 
 <br />
 and the Press?, 17 UCLA L. Rev. 1180 (1970) 8 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Mark Rose, Authors and Owners: 
 <br />
 The Invention of Copyright (1993) 6 
-<br />
+</li><li>
 Cecily Violet Wedgwood, The King's Peace (1955) 5 
-</p>
+</li>
+</ul>
+</div>
+</div>
+<hr class="no-display" />
 
+<div class="emph-box c">
 <p>
 No. 01-618 
 <br />   
@@ -293,6 +326,7 @@
 <br />   
 <br />  
 </p>
+</div>
 
 <h3 id="SECTION04000000000000000000">Interest of <i>Amicus
 Curiae</i></h3>
@@ -393,9 +427,9 @@
 
 <h3 id="SECTION06000000000000000000">Argument</h3>
 
-<h3 id="SECTION06010000000000000000">The Framers Intended Copyright
+<h4 id="SECTION06010000000000000000">I. The Framers Intended Copyright
 to Be a Statutory Monopoly Awarded to Works of Authorship For A
-Strictly Limited Time</h3>
+Strictly Limited Time</h4>
 
 <p>
 The words &ldquo;for limited Times&rdquo; appear in the Copyright
@@ -475,9 +509,9 @@
 before the Court, which postpones the reversion on every single
 existing copyright for decades.</p>
 
-<h3 id="SECTION06020000000000000000">The Historical Policy Embodied
+<h4 id="SECTION06020000000000000000">II. The Historical Policy Embodied
 in the Copyright Clause is Absolutely Essential to Reconcile the
-Copyright Monopoly with the System of Free Expression</h3>
+Copyright Monopoly with the System of Free Expression</h4>
 
 <p>
 As important as the principle of limited time is in the general
@@ -579,9 +613,9 @@
 itself, the Court of Appeals failed in its duty to protect the
 invaluable interests of the system of free expression.</p>
 
-<h4 id="SECTION06021000000000000000">Indefinite Extension of the
+<h5 id="SECTION06021000000000000000">A. Indefinite Extension of the
 Term of Monopoly on Existing Works of Authorship is Incompatible with
-Both the Copyright Clause and the First Amendment</h4>
+Both the Copyright Clause and the First Amendment</h5>
 
 <p>
 Precisely because the creation of exclusive rights in expressions
@@ -660,11 +694,11 @@
 are undeniably &ldquo;writings&rdquo; in the same crabbed sense that
 the term extension contained in the CTEA is &ldquo;limited.&rdquo;</p>
 
-<h4 id="SECTION06022000000000000000">The Fifth Amendment Prohibits
+<h5 id="SECTION06022000000000000000">B. The Fifth Amendment Prohibits
 Legislative Action Such as This With Respect to Physical Property
 Rights, and There Is No Constitutional Justification for Permitting
 What Cannot Be Done with Mere Property to be Done with Free
-Expression</h4>
+Expression</h5>
 
 <p>
 On the logic of the Court of Appeals' holding, which is apparently
@@ -728,9 +762,9 @@
 were granted, had it not been for unconstitutional Congressional
 interference.</p>
 
-<h3 id="SECTION06030000000000000000">Particular Dangers of Abuse and
+<h4 id="SECTION06030000000000000000">III. Particular Dangers of Abuse and
 Corruption Justify Strict Constitutional Scrutiny When the Term of
-Statutory Monopolies is Extended</h3>
+Statutory Monopolies is Extended</h4>
 
 <p>
 During the first century of our Republic, the term of copyright was
@@ -778,13 +812,11 @@
 
 <p>
 Respectfully submitted.
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
 </p>
 
-<ul>
-<li>E<small>BEN </small>M<small>OGLEN</small> 
+<div class="signature">
+<address>
+E<small>BEN </small>M<small>OGLEN</small> 
 <br />   <i>Counsel of record</i>
 <br />
 435 West 116th Street 
@@ -793,12 +825,12 @@
 <br />  (212) 854-8382 <br />
 <br />
 Counsel for <i>Amicus Curiae</i>
-</li>
-</ul>
+</address>
+</div>
 
+<div class="infobox">
 <hr />
-
-<ul>
+<ul class="no-bullet">
 <li><a id="foot151" href="#tex2html1"><sup>1</sup></a> Counsel for
 both parties have consented to the filing of this brief, and those
 consents have been filed with the Clerk of this Court.  No counsel for
@@ -827,11 +859,12 @@
 books, films, or music by conveying to the conservator a statutory
 monopoly of copying and distribution lasting decades.</li>
 </ul>
-
+</div>
+</div>
 
 </div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
-<div id="footer">
+<div id="footer" role="contentinfo">
 <div class="unprintable">
 
 <p>Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
@@ -849,13 +882,13 @@
         to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org";>
         &lt;web-translators@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
 
-        <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        <p>For information on coordinating and contributing translations of
         our web pages, see <a
         href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
         README</a>. -->
 Please see the <a
 href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
-README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and contributing translations
 of this article.</p>
 </div>
 
@@ -886,10 +919,10 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2020/12/09 08:02:11 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 10:36:03 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>
-</div>
+</div><!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include -->
 </body>
 </html>

Index: philosophy/po/essays-and-articles.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/essays-and-articles.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.97
retrieving revision 1.98
diff -u -b -r1.97 -r1.98
--- philosophy/po/essays-and-articles.fr-en.html        28 Aug 2021 17:31:57 
-0000      1.97
+++ philosophy/po/essays-and-articles.fr-en.html        4 Sep 2021 10:36:03 
-0000       1.98
@@ -713,7 +713,7 @@
   <cite>Nature WebDebates</cite></a> in 2001)
   &mdash; This article explains how copyright is impeding progress in
   scientific research.  You may also be interested
-  in <a href="https://www.plos.org/";>The Public Library of Science</a>,
+  in <a href="https://plos.org/";>The Public Library of Science</a>,
   which is dedicated to making scientific research freely available to all
   on the Internet.</li>
  <li><!--#set var='DATE' value='<span class="date-tag">[2001]</span>'
@@ -1120,7 +1120,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/08/28 17:31:57 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 10:36:03 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: proprietary/all.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/all.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.25
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -b -r1.25 -r1.26
--- proprietary/all.fr.html     1 Sep 2021 19:32:58 -0000       1.25
+++ proprietary/all.fr.html     4 Sep 2021 10:36:03 -0000       1.26
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
  &ndash; Dernière référence : <!--#echo encoding='none' var='PUB' -->
 </small>
     <p>Le chien de garde russe des communications <a
-href="https://www.reuters.com/article/legal-russia-navalny-apps/russian-watchdog-tells-google-apple-to-remove-navalny-app-report-idUSKBN2FL1DM";>a
+href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/russian-watchdog-tells-google-apple-remove-navalny-app-report-2021-08-20/";>a
 dit à Google et Apple de supprimer l'appli de Navalny</a> de leurs app
 stores.</p>
 
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@
     <p>Microsoft <a
 
href="https://www.slashgear.com/windows-10-users-are-grumpy-over-forced-updates-and-unwanted-apps-18643135/";>force
 les utilisateurs de Windows</a> à <a
-href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/manage-updates-in-windows-10-643e9ea7-3cf6-7da6-a25c-95d4f7f099fe";>installer
+href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/manage-updates-in-windows-643e9ea7-3cf6-7da6-a25c-95d4f7f099fe";>installer
 les mises à jour téléchargées automatiquement</a>. Ces dernières peuvent
 avoir des effets néfastes, comme de restreindre certaines fonctionnalités de
 l'ordinateur ou d'obliger des utilisateurs sans défense à faire ce que
@@ -3184,7 +3184,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Dernière mise à jour :
 
-$Date: 2021/09/01 19:32:58 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 10:36:03 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: proprietary/malware-apple.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/malware-apple.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.121
retrieving revision 1.122
diff -u -b -r1.121 -r1.122
--- proprietary/malware-apple.fr.html   1 Sep 2021 19:32:58 -0000       1.121
+++ proprietary/malware-apple.fr.html   4 Sep 2021 10:36:03 -0000       1.122
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@
     -->
 <!--#echo encoding="none" var="DATE" -->
 <p>Le chien de garde russe des communications <a
-href="https://www.reuters.com/article/legal-russia-navalny-apps/russian-watchdog-tells-google-apple-to-remove-navalny-app-report-idUSKBN2FL1DM";>a
+href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/russian-watchdog-tells-google-apple-remove-navalny-app-report-2021-08-20/";>a
 dit à Google et Apple de supprimer l'appli de Navalny</a> de leurs app
 stores.</p>
 
@@ -1494,7 +1494,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Dernière mise à jour :
 
-$Date: 2021/09/01 19:32:58 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 10:36:03 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: proprietary/malware-microsoft.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/malware-microsoft.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.118
retrieving revision 1.119
diff -u -b -r1.118 -r1.119
--- proprietary/malware-microsoft.fr.html       15 Jul 2021 09:33:32 -0000      
1.118
+++ proprietary/malware-microsoft.fr.html       4 Sep 2021 10:36:03 -0000       
1.119
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
 <p>Microsoft <a
 
href="https://www.slashgear.com/windows-10-users-are-grumpy-over-forced-updates-and-unwanted-apps-18643135/";>force
 les utilisateurs de Windows</a> à <a
-href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/manage-updates-in-windows-10-643e9ea7-3cf6-7da6-a25c-95d4f7f099fe";>installer
+href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/manage-updates-in-windows-643e9ea7-3cf6-7da6-a25c-95d4f7f099fe";>installer
 les mises à jour téléchargées automatiquement</a>. Ces dernières peuvent
 avoir des effets néfastes, comme de restreindre certaines fonctionnalités de
 l'ordinateur ou d'obliger des utilisateurs sans défense à faire ce que
@@ -242,8 +242,8 @@
 
     <p>L'entreprise de recherche en sécurité a divulgué accidentellement des
 instructions sur la manière d'exploiter cette faille, mais les utilisateurs
-de Windows attendent toujours que Microsoft la corrige – si jamais ils la
-corrigent.</p>
+de Windows attendent toujours que Microsoft la corrige – si cela arrive un
+jour.</p>
 
     <p><small>(Notez que cet article utilise le terme « <a
 href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Hacker">hackers</a> » à mauvais
@@ -1182,7 +1182,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Dernière mise à jour :
 
-$Date: 2021/07/15 09:33:32 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 10:36:03 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: proprietary/proprietary-drm.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/proprietary-drm.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.58
retrieving revision 1.59
diff -u -b -r1.58 -r1.59
--- proprietary/proprietary-drm.fr.html 8 Jun 2021 07:29:45 -0000       1.58
+++ proprietary/proprietary-drm.fr.html 4 Sep 2021 10:36:03 -0000       1.59
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
 <p>Microsoft <a
 
href="https://www.slashgear.com/windows-10-users-are-grumpy-over-forced-updates-and-unwanted-apps-18643135/";>force
 les utilisateurs de Windows</a> à <a
-href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/manage-updates-in-windows-10-643e9ea7-3cf6-7da6-a25c-95d4f7f099fe";>installer
+href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/manage-updates-in-windows-643e9ea7-3cf6-7da6-a25c-95d4f7f099fe";>installer
 les mises à jour téléchargées automatiquement</a>. Ces dernières peuvent
 avoir des effets néfastes, comme de restreindre certaines fonctionnalités de
 l'ordinateur ou d'obliger des utilisateurs sans défense à faire ce que
@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Dernière mise à jour :
 
-$Date: 2021/06/08 07:29:45 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 10:36:03 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: proprietary/proprietary-interference.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/proprietary-interference.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.73
retrieving revision 1.74
diff -u -b -r1.73 -r1.74
--- proprietary/proprietary-interference.fr.html        26 Jul 2021 19:01:17 
-0000      1.73
+++ proprietary/proprietary-interference.fr.html        4 Sep 2021 10:36:03 
-0000       1.74
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@
 <p>Microsoft <a
 
href="https://www.slashgear.com/windows-10-users-are-grumpy-over-forced-updates-and-unwanted-apps-18643135/";>force
 les utilisateurs de Windows</a> à <a
-href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/manage-updates-in-windows-10-643e9ea7-3cf6-7da6-a25c-95d4f7f099fe";>installer
+href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/manage-updates-in-windows-643e9ea7-3cf6-7da6-a25c-95d4f7f099fe";>installer
 les mises à jour téléchargées automatiquement</a>. Ces dernières peuvent
 avoir des effets néfastes, comme de restreindre certaines fonctionnalités de
 l'ordinateur ou d'obliger des utilisateurs sans défense à faire ce que
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Dernière mise à jour :
 
-$Date: 2021/07/26 19:01:17 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 10:36:03 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: proprietary/proprietary-jails.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/proprietary-jails.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.54
retrieving revision 1.55
diff -u -b -r1.54 -r1.55
--- proprietary/proprietary-jails.fr.html       1 Sep 2021 19:32:58 -0000       
1.54
+++ proprietary/proprietary-jails.fr.html       4 Sep 2021 10:36:03 -0000       
1.55
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@
     -->
 <!--#echo encoding="none" var="DATE" -->
 <p>Le chien de garde russe des communications <a
-href="https://www.reuters.com/article/legal-russia-navalny-apps/russian-watchdog-tells-google-apple-to-remove-navalny-app-report-idUSKBN2FL1DM";>a
+href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/russian-watchdog-tells-google-apple-remove-navalny-app-report-2021-08-20/";>a
 dit à Google et Apple de supprimer l'appli de Navalny</a> de leurs app
 stores.</p>
 
@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Dernière mise à jour :
 
-$Date: 2021/09/01 19:32:58 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 10:36:03 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: proprietary/proprietary.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/proprietary.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.239
retrieving revision 1.240
diff -u -b -r1.239 -r1.240
--- proprietary/proprietary.fr.html     1 Sep 2021 19:32:58 -0000       1.239
+++ proprietary/proprietary.fr.html     4 Sep 2021 10:36:03 -0000       1.240
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@
     -->
 <!--#echo encoding="none" var="DATE" -->
 <p>Le chien de garde russe des communications <a
-href="https://www.reuters.com/article/legal-russia-navalny-apps/russian-watchdog-tells-google-apple-to-remove-navalny-app-report-idUSKBN2FL1DM";>a
+href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/russian-watchdog-tells-google-apple-remove-navalny-app-report-2021-08-20/";>a
 dit à Google et Apple de supprimer l'appli de Navalny</a> de leurs app
 stores.</p>
 
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Dernière mise à jour :
 
-$Date: 2021/09/01 19:32:58 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 10:36:03 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: proprietary/po/all.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/all.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -b -r1.21 -r1.22
--- proprietary/po/all.fr-en.html       1 Sep 2021 19:33:00 -0000       1.21
+++ proprietary/po/all.fr-en.html       4 Sep 2021 10:36:03 -0000       1.22
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
 
 <!--#set var='ADD' value='2021-09-01' --><!--#set var='PUB' value='2021-08-20' 
--><li><small class='date-tag'>Added: <span class="gnun-split"></span><!--#echo 
encoding='none' var='ADD' --><span class="gnun-split"></span> &mdash; Latest 
reference: <span class="gnun-split"></span><!--#echo encoding='none' var='PUB' 
--></small>
     <p>The Russian communications watchdog <a
-    
href="https://www.reuters.com/article/legal-russia-navalny-apps/russian-watchdog-tells-google-apple-to-remove-navalny-app-report-idUSKBN2FL1DM";>
+    
href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/russian-watchdog-tells-google-apple-remove-navalny-app-report-2021-08-20/";>
     tells Google and Apple to remove Navalny's app</a> from their
     stores.</p>
 
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@
     <p>Microsoft is <a
     
href="https://www.slashgear.com/windows-10-users-are-grumpy-over-forced-updates-and-unwanted-apps-18643135/";>forcing
     Windows users</a> to <a
-    
href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/manage-updates-in-windows-10-643e9ea7-3cf6-7da6-a25c-95d4f7f099fe";>install
+    
href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/manage-updates-in-windows-643e9ea7-3cf6-7da6-a25c-95d4f7f099fe";>install
     upgrades it pushes</a> using <a
     href="/proprietary/proprietary-back-doors.html#windows-update">its
     universal back doors</a>. These upgrades can do various harms to
@@ -2351,7 +2351,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/09/01 19:33:00 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 10:36:03 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: proprietary/po/malware-apple.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/malware-apple.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.112
retrieving revision 1.113
diff -u -b -r1.112 -r1.113
--- proprietary/po/malware-apple.fr-en.html     1 Sep 2021 19:33:00 -0000       
1.112
+++ proprietary/po/malware-apple.fr-en.html     4 Sep 2021 10:36:03 -0000       
1.113
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@
     <!--#set var="DATE" value='<small class="date-tag">2021-08</small>'
     --><!--#echo encoding="none" var="DATE" -->
     <p>The Russian communications watchdog <a
-    
href="https://www.reuters.com/article/legal-russia-navalny-apps/russian-watchdog-tells-google-apple-to-remove-navalny-app-report-idUSKBN2FL1DM";>
+    
href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/russian-watchdog-tells-google-apple-remove-navalny-app-report-2021-08-20/";>
     tells Google and Apple to remove Navalny's app</a> from their
     stores.</p>
 
@@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/09/01 19:33:00 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 10:36:03 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.108
retrieving revision 1.109
diff -u -b -r1.108 -r1.109
--- proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.fr-en.html 15 Jul 2021 09:33:32 -0000      
1.108
+++ proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.fr-en.html 4 Sep 2021 10:36:03 -0000       
1.109
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
     <p>Microsoft is <a
     
href="https://www.slashgear.com/windows-10-users-are-grumpy-over-forced-updates-and-unwanted-apps-18643135/";>forcing
     Windows users</a> to <a
-    
href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/manage-updates-in-windows-10-643e9ea7-3cf6-7da6-a25c-95d4f7f099fe";>install
+    
href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/manage-updates-in-windows-643e9ea7-3cf6-7da6-a25c-95d4f7f099fe";>install
     upgrades it pushes</a> using <a
     href="/proprietary/proprietary-back-doors.html#windows-update">its
     universal back doors</a>. These upgrades can do various harms to
@@ -971,7 +971,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/07/15 09:33:32 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 10:36:03 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: proprietary/po/proprietary-drm.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-drm.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.51
retrieving revision 1.52
diff -u -b -r1.51 -r1.52
--- proprietary/po/proprietary-drm.fr-en.html   8 Jun 2021 07:29:46 -0000       
1.51
+++ proprietary/po/proprietary-drm.fr-en.html   4 Sep 2021 10:36:03 -0000       
1.52
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@
     <p>Microsoft is <a
     
href="https://www.slashgear.com/windows-10-users-are-grumpy-over-forced-updates-and-unwanted-apps-18643135/";>forcing
     Windows users</a> to <a
-    
href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/manage-updates-in-windows-10-643e9ea7-3cf6-7da6-a25c-95d4f7f099fe";>install
+    
href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/manage-updates-in-windows-643e9ea7-3cf6-7da6-a25c-95d4f7f099fe";>install
     upgrades it pushes</a> using <a
     href="/proprietary/proprietary-back-doors.html#windows-update">its
     universal back doors</a>. These upgrades can do various harms to
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/06/08 07:29:46 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 10:36:03 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: proprietary/po/proprietary-interference.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-interference.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.60
retrieving revision 1.61
diff -u -b -r1.60 -r1.61
--- proprietary/po/proprietary-interference.fr-en.html  26 Jul 2021 19:01:19 
-0000      1.60
+++ proprietary/po/proprietary-interference.fr-en.html  4 Sep 2021 10:36:03 
-0000       1.61
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@
     <p>Microsoft is <a
     
href="https://www.slashgear.com/windows-10-users-are-grumpy-over-forced-updates-and-unwanted-apps-18643135/";>forcing
     Windows users</a> to <a
-    
href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/manage-updates-in-windows-10-643e9ea7-3cf6-7da6-a25c-95d4f7f099fe";>install
+    
href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/manage-updates-in-windows-643e9ea7-3cf6-7da6-a25c-95d4f7f099fe";>install
     upgrades it pushes</a> using <a
     href="/proprietary/proprietary-back-doors.html#windows-update">its
     universal back doors</a>. These upgrades can do various harms to
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/07/26 19:01:19 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 10:36:03 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: proprietary/po/proprietary-jails.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-jails.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.45
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -u -b -r1.45 -r1.46
--- proprietary/po/proprietary-jails.fr-en.html 1 Sep 2021 19:33:00 -0000       
1.45
+++ proprietary/po/proprietary-jails.fr-en.html 4 Sep 2021 10:36:03 -0000       
1.46
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@
     <!--#set var="DATE" value='<small class="date-tag">2021-08</small>'
     --><!--#echo encoding="none" var="DATE" -->
     <p>The Russian communications watchdog <a
-    
href="https://www.reuters.com/article/legal-russia-navalny-apps/russian-watchdog-tells-google-apple-to-remove-navalny-app-report-idUSKBN2FL1DM";>
+    
href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/russian-watchdog-tells-google-apple-remove-navalny-app-report-2021-08-20/";>
     tells Google and Apple to remove Navalny's app</a> from their
     stores.</p>
 
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/09/01 19:33:00 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 10:36:03 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: proprietary/po/proprietary.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.224
retrieving revision 1.225
diff -u -b -r1.224 -r1.225
--- proprietary/po/proprietary.fr-en.html       1 Sep 2021 19:33:00 -0000       
1.224
+++ proprietary/po/proprietary.fr-en.html       4 Sep 2021 10:36:03 -0000       
1.225
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@
     <!--#set var="DATE" value='<small class="date-tag">2021-08</small>'
     --><!--#echo encoding="none" var="DATE" -->
     <p>The Russian communications watchdog <a
-    
href="https://www.reuters.com/article/legal-russia-navalny-apps/russian-watchdog-tells-google-apple-to-remove-navalny-app-report-idUSKBN2FL1DM";>
+    
href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/russian-watchdog-tells-google-apple-remove-navalny-app-report-2021-08-20/";>
     tells Google and Apple to remove Navalny's app</a> from their
     stores.</p>
 
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/09/01 19:33:00 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 10:36:03 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]