www/philosophy google-engineering-talk.html

[Therese Godefroy]

CVSROOT:        /webcvs/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Therese Godefroy <th_g> 21/09/04 07:07:20

Modified files:
        philosophy     : google-engineering-talk.html 

Log message:
        More changes that shouldn't affect translations: double hyphen > mdash;
        nonfree in anchor reverted to non-free; comma inside quotes.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/google-engineering-talk.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.31&r2=1.32

Patches:
Index: google-engineering-talk.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/philosophy/google-engineering-talk.html,v
retrieving revision 1.31
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -b -r1.31 -r1.32
--- google-engineering-talk.html        3 Sep 2021 15:07:49 -0000       1.31
+++ google-engineering-talk.html        4 Sep 2021 11:07:20 -0000       1.32
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
 <li><a href="#games-as-free-software">28. Games as free software</a></li>
 <li><a href="#gpl-freedoms-for-cars-saving-seeds">29. GPL freedoms for
 cars, saving seeds</a></li>
-<li><a href="#no-software-is-better-than-nonfree-software">30. No software is 
better than nonfree software</a></li>
+<li><a href="#no-software-is-better-than-non-free-software">30. No software is 
better than nonfree software</a></li>
 <li><a href="#portability-of-free-software">31. Portability of free
 software</a></li>
 <li><a href="#is-some-free-software-obfuscated-on-purpose">32. Is some
@@ -389,8 +389,7 @@
 the program to qualify as free software. All of these are freedoms that
 no computer user should ever be denied.</p>
 
-<p>[<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">
-gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html</a>]</p>
+<p>[<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html</a>]</p>
 
 <h3 id="freedom-2-moral-dilemma">7. Freedom 2   moral dilemma</h3>
 
@@ -518,8 +517,8 @@
 you can do. So that's the back door that Microsoft knows about and we
 know about.</p>
 
-<p>[Added in 2010: We later learned that Microsoft can force 
&ldquo;upgrades&rdquo;
--- a much nastier back door.]</p>
+<p>[Added in 2010: We later learned that Microsoft can force
+&ldquo;upgrades&rdquo;&mdash;a much nastier back door.]</p>
 
 <p>There might be other back doors that we don't know about and maybe
 even Microsoft doesn't know about. When I was in India in January, I was
@@ -889,7 +888,7 @@
 <p>Fortunately, we didn't have to wait for that, because in 1991, Linus
 Torvalds, a Finnish college student, developed his own kernel, using the
 traditional monolithic design, and he got it to barely run in less than
-a year. Initially, Linux --that's what this kernel's name was-- was not
+a year. Initially, Linux&mdash;that's what this kernel's name was&mdash;was not
 free, but in 1992 he re-released it under the GNU General Public License
 and at that point it was free software. And so it was possible, by
 combining Linux and the GNU system, to make a complete free operating
@@ -948,7 +947,7 @@
 
 <p>But this tends to be forgotten nowadays. You will see, if you look
 around, most of the discussion of the GNU system calls it Linux, and
-tends to refer to it as &ldquo;open source&rdquo; rather than as &ldquo;free 
software&rdquo;,
+tends to refer to it as &ldquo;open source&rdquo; rather than as &ldquo;free 
software,&rdquo;
 and doesn't mention freedom as an issue. This issue, which is the reason
 for the system's existence, is mostly forgotten. You see many techies
 who prefer to think of technical questions in a narrowly technical
@@ -1457,7 +1456,7 @@
 right to save seeds and that it's tyranny to stop them. A democratic
 government would never do that.</p>
 
-<h3 id="no-software-is-better-than-nonfree-software">30. No software is
+<h3 id="no-software-is-better-than-non-free-software">30. No software is
 better than nonfree software</h3>
 
 <p><b>AUDIENCE:</b> [roughly] Do you see a problem with free software
@@ -1748,7 +1747,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/09/03 15:07:49 $
+$Date: 2021/09/04 11:07:20 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>