[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/proprietary/po proprietary-surveillance.de....
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/proprietary/po proprietary-surveillance.de.... |
|
Date: |
Sun, 22 Apr 2018 12:29:02 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 18/04/22 12:29:01
Modified files:
proprietary/po : proprietary-surveillance.de.po
proprietary-surveillance.fr.po
proprietary-surveillance.it-diff.html
proprietary-surveillance.it.po
proprietary-surveillance.ja-diff.html
proprietary-surveillance.ja.po
proprietary-surveillance.pot
proprietary-surveillance.ru.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-surveillance.de.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.203&r2=1.204
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-surveillance.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.273&r2=1.274
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-surveillance.it-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.48&r2=1.49
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-surveillance.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.221&r2=1.222
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-surveillance.ja-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.59&r2=1.60
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-surveillance.ja.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.194&r2=1.195
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-surveillance.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.143&r2=1.144
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-surveillance.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.345&r2=1.346
Patches:
Index: proprietary-surveillance.de.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-surveillance.de.po,v
retrieving revision 1.203
retrieving revision 1.204
diff -u -b -r1.203 -r1.204
--- proprietary-surveillance.de.po 9 Apr 2018 23:59:24 -0000 1.203
+++ proprietary-surveillance.de.po 22 Apr 2018 16:29:01 -0000 1.204
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: proprietary-surveillance.html\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: Webmasters <address@hidden>\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2018-04-09 23:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2018-04-22 16:25+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2018-03-10 22:00+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Jоегg Kоhпе <joeko (AT) online [PUNKT] de>\n"
"Language-Team: German <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -704,6 +704,26 @@
#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
msgid ""
+"More than <a href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/16/child-";
+"apps-games-android-us-google-play-store-data-sharing-law-privacy\">50% of "
+"the 5,855 Android apps studied by researchers were found to snoop and "
+"collect information about its users</a>. 40% of the apps were found to "
+"insecurely snitch on its users. Furthermore, they could detect only some "
+"methods of snooping, in these proprietary apps whose source code they cannot "
+"look at. The other apps might be snooping in other ways."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
+msgid ""
+"This is evidence that proprietary apps generally work against its users. "
+"Android users must choose to use apps from the free software only <a href="
+"\"https://f-droid.org/\";>F-Droid store</a> that <a href=\"https://f-droid.";
+"org/wiki/page/Antifeatures\"> prominently warns the user if an app contains "
+"anti-features</a>."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
+msgid ""
"20 dishonest Android apps recorded <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/";
"information-technology/2017/07/stealthy-google-play-apps-recorded-calls-and-"
"stole-e-mails-and-texts\">phone calls and sent them and text messages and "
Index: proprietary-surveillance.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-surveillance.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.273
retrieving revision 1.274
diff -u -b -r1.273 -r1.274
--- proprietary-surveillance.fr.po 10 Apr 2018 07:40:42 -0000 1.273
+++ proprietary-surveillance.fr.po 22 Apr 2018 16:29:01 -0000 1.274
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: proprietary-surveillance.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2018-04-09 23:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2018-04-22 16:25+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2018-04-10 09:39+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Félicien Pillot <felicien AT gnu.org>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2018-04-22 16:25+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: \n"
"X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
@@ -688,6 +689,26 @@
#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
msgid ""
+"More than <a href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/16/child-";
+"apps-games-android-us-google-play-store-data-sharing-law-privacy\">50% of "
+"the 5,855 Android apps studied by researchers were found to snoop and "
+"collect information about its users</a>. 40% of the apps were found to "
+"insecurely snitch on its users. Furthermore, they could detect only some "
+"methods of snooping, in these proprietary apps whose source code they cannot "
+"look at. The other apps might be snooping in other ways."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
+msgid ""
+"This is evidence that proprietary apps generally work against its users. "
+"Android users must choose to use apps from the free software only <a href="
+"\"https://f-droid.org/\";>F-Droid store</a> that <a href=\"https://f-droid.";
+"org/wiki/page/Antifeatures\"> prominently warns the user if an app contains "
+"anti-features</a>."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
+msgid ""
"20 dishonest Android apps recorded <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/";
"information-technology/2017/07/stealthy-google-play-apps-recorded-calls-and-"
"stole-e-mails-and-texts\">phone calls and sent them and text messages and "
Index: proprietary-surveillance.it-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-surveillance.it-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.48
retrieving revision 1.49
diff -u -b -r1.48 -r1.49
--- proprietary-surveillance.it-diff.html 9 Apr 2018 23:59:24 -0000
1.48
+++ proprietary-surveillance.it-diff.html 22 Apr 2018 16:29:01 -0000
1.49
@@ -356,40 +356,60 @@
<ul>
<li>
- <span class="removed"><del><strong><p><a
href="http://www.privmetrics.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/wisec2015.pdf">A
study in 2015</a> found that 90% of the top-ranked gratis
- proprietary</strong></del></span>
- <span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>20 dishonest</em></ins></span>
Android apps <span class="removed"><del><strong>contained recognizable tracking
libraries. For</strong></del></span>
+ <span class="removed"><del><strong><p><a
href="http://www.privmetrics.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/wisec2015.pdf">A
study in 2015</a> found that 90%</strong></del></span>
+ <span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>More
+ than <a
href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/16/child-apps-games-android-us-google-play-store-data-sharing-law-privacy">50%</em></ins></span>
+ of the <span class="removed"><del><strong>top-ranked gratis
+ proprietary</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>5,855</em></ins></span> Android apps <span
class="removed"><del><strong>contained recognizable tracking libraries.
For</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>studied by
researchers were found to
+ snoop and collect information about its users</a>. 40%
of</em></ins></span> the <span class="removed"><del><strong>paid proprietary
apps, it was only 60%.</p>
+
+ <p>The article confusingly describes gratis</strong></del></span> apps
<span class="removed"><del><strong>as “free”,
+ but most</strong></del></span>
+ <span class="inserted"><ins><em>were found to insecurely snitch on its
users. Furthermore, they
+ could detect only some methods</em></ins></span> of <span
class="removed"><del><strong>them are not</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>snooping,</em></ins></span> in <span
class="removed"><del><strong>fact
+ <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a>.
+ It also uses the ugly word “monetize”. A good replacement
+ for that word</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>these
proprietary
+ apps whose source code they cannot look at. The other apps might
+ be snooping in other ways.</p>
+
+ <p>This</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“exploit”; nearly
always</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>evidence</em></ins></span> that <span
class="removed"><del><strong>will fit
+ perfectly.</p>
+</li>
+
+<li>
+ <p>Apps for BART
+ <a
href="https://consumerist.com/2017/05/23/passengers-say-commuter-rail-app-illegally-collects-personal-user-data/">snoop
on users</a>.</p>
+ <p>With</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>proprietary apps generally work against its
+ users. Android users must choose to use apps from the</em></ins></span>
free
+ software <span class="removed"><del><strong>apps, users could
<em>make sure</em> that they don't snoop.</p>
+ <p>With proprietary apps, one can</strong></del></span> only <span
class="removed"><del><strong>hope</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em><a href="https://f-droid.org/">F-Droid
store</a></em></ins></span>
+ that <span class="removed"><del><strong>they
don't.</p></strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="https://f-droid.org/wiki/page/Antifeatures">
+ prominently warns the user if an app contains
+ anti-features</a>.</p></em></ins></span>
+</li>
+
+<li>
+ <span class="removed"><del><strong><p>A study found
234</strong></del></span>
+ <span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>20 dishonest</em></ins></span>
Android apps <span class="removed"><del><strong>that track
users</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>recorded <a
href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/07/stealthy-google-play-apps-recorded-calls-and-stole-e-mails-and-texts">phone
calls and sent them and text messages and emails to
snoopers</a>.</p>
- <p>Google did not intend to make these apps spy; on</em></ins></span>
the <span class="removed"><del><strong>paid proprietary
apps,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>contrary,</em></ins></span> it <span
class="removed"><del><strong>was only 60%.</p>
-
- <p>The article confusingly describes gratis</strong></del></span>
- <span class="inserted"><ins><em>worked in various ways to prevent that,
and deleted these</em></ins></span> apps <span class="removed"><del><strong>as
“free”,
- but most</strong></del></span>
- <span class="inserted"><ins><em>after discovering what they did. So we
cannot blame Google
- specifically for the snooping</em></ins></span> of <span
class="removed"><del><strong>them are not</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>these apps.</p>
+ <p>Google did not intend to make these apps spy; on the contrary, it
+ worked in various ways to prevent that, and deleted these apps
+ after discovering what they did. So we cannot blame Google
+ specifically for the snooping of these apps.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Google redistributes nonfree Android apps, and
- therefore shares</em></ins></span> in <span
class="removed"><del><strong>fact
- <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a>.
- It also uses</strong></del></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>ugly word “monetize”. A good
replacement</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>responsibility</em></ins></span> for <span
class="removed"><del><strong>that word</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>the injustice of their
+ therefore shares in the responsibility for the injustice of their
being nonfree. It also distributes its own nonfree apps, such as
Google
Play, <a
href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html">which
are malicious</a>.</p>
<p>Could Google have done a better job of preventing apps from
- cheating? There</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“exploit”; nearly always that will fit
- perfectly.</p>
-</li>
-
-<li>
- <p>Apps</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>no
systematic way</em></ins></span> for <span class="removed"><del><strong>BART
- <a
href="https://consumerist.com/2017/05/23/passengers-say-commuter-rail-app-illegally-collects-personal-user-data/">snoop
on users</a>.</p>
- <p>With free software apps, users could <em>make sure</em>
that they don't snoop.</p>
- <p>With proprietary apps, one</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Google, or Android
+ cheating? There is no systematic way for Google, or Android
users, to inspect executable proprietary apps to see what they
do.</p>
@@ -468,11 +488,11 @@
<p>Apps for BART
<a
href="https://consumerist.com/2017/05/23/passengers-say-commuter-rail-app-illegally-collects-personal-user-data/">snoop
on users</a>.</p>
<p>With free software apps, users could <em>make sure</em>
that they don't snoop.</p>
- <p>With proprietary apps, one</em></ins></span> can only hope that
they don't.</p>
+ <p>With proprietary apps, one can only hope that they don't.</p>
</li>
<li>
- <p>A study found 234 Android apps that track users by
+ <p>A study found 234 Android apps that track users</em></ins></span> by
<a
href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/234-android-applications-are-currently-using-ultrasonic-beacons-to-track-users/">listening
to ultrasound from beacons placed in stores or played by TV
programs</a>.
</p>
@@ -1713,7 +1733,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2018/04/09 23:59:24 $
+$Date: 2018/04/22 16:29:01 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: proprietary-surveillance.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-surveillance.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.221
retrieving revision 1.222
diff -u -b -r1.221 -r1.222
--- proprietary-surveillance.it.po 9 Apr 2018 23:59:24 -0000 1.221
+++ proprietary-surveillance.it.po 22 Apr 2018 16:29:01 -0000 1.222
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: proprietary-surveillance.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2018-04-09 23:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2018-04-22 16:25+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2017-12-31 13:19+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Andrea Pescetti <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Italian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -702,6 +702,26 @@
#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
msgid ""
+"More than <a href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/16/child-";
+"apps-games-android-us-google-play-store-data-sharing-law-privacy\">50% of "
+"the 5,855 Android apps studied by researchers were found to snoop and "
+"collect information about its users</a>. 40% of the apps were found to "
+"insecurely snitch on its users. Furthermore, they could detect only some "
+"methods of snooping, in these proprietary apps whose source code they cannot "
+"look at. The other apps might be snooping in other ways."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
+msgid ""
+"This is evidence that proprietary apps generally work against its users. "
+"Android users must choose to use apps from the free software only <a href="
+"\"https://f-droid.org/\";>F-Droid store</a> that <a href=\"https://f-droid.";
+"org/wiki/page/Antifeatures\"> prominently warns the user if an app contains "
+"anti-features</a>."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
+msgid ""
"20 dishonest Android apps recorded <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/";
"information-technology/2017/07/stealthy-google-play-apps-recorded-calls-and-"
"stole-e-mails-and-texts\">phone calls and sent them and text messages and "
Index: proprietary-surveillance.ja-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-surveillance.ja-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.59
retrieving revision 1.60
diff -u -b -r1.59 -r1.60
--- proprietary-surveillance.ja-diff.html 9 Apr 2018 23:59:24 -0000
1.59
+++ proprietary-surveillance.ja-diff.html 22 Apr 2018 16:29:01 -0000
1.60
@@ -355,42 +355,60 @@
</div>
<ul>
- <span class="removed"><del><strong><li><p>More than 73% of the
most popular</strong></del></span>
+ <span
class="removed"><del><strong><li><p>More</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em><li>
- <p>20 dishonest</em></ins></span> Android apps
- <span class="inserted"><ins><em>recorded</em></ins></span> <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://jots.pub/a/2015103001/index.php">share
personal,
- behavioral</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/07/stealthy-google-play-apps-recorded-calls-and-stole-e-mails-and-texts">phone
- calls</em></ins></span> and <span class="removed"><del><strong>location
information</a> of their users with third parties.</p>
- </li>
-
- <li><p>“Cryptic communication,”
unrelated</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>sent them and
text messages and emails</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>the app's functionality,
- was <a
href="http://news.mit.edu/2015/data-transferred-android-apps-hiding-1119">
- found in the 500 most popular gratis Android apps</a>.</p>
+ <p>More</em></ins></span>
+ than <span class="removed"><del><strong>73%</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/16/child-apps-games-android-us-google-play-store-data-sharing-law-privacy">50%</em></ins></span>
+ of the <span class="removed"><del><strong>most
popular</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>5,855</em></ins></span> Android apps
+ <span class="removed"><del><strong><a
href="http://jots.pub/a/2015103001/index.php">share personal,
+ behavioral</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>studied by
researchers were found to
+ snoop</em></ins></span> and <span class="removed"><del><strong>location
information</a></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>collect information about its users</a>.
40%</em></ins></span> of <span class="removed"><del><strong>their users with
third parties.</p>
+ </li>
+
+ <li><p>“Cryptic communication,” unrelated
to</strong></del></span> the <span class="removed"><del><strong>app's
functionality,
+ was <a
href="http://news.mit.edu/2015/data-transferred-android-apps-hiding-1119"></strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>apps
+ were</em></ins></span> found <span class="inserted"><ins><em>to insecurely
snitch on its users. Furthermore, they
+ could detect only some methods of snooping,</em></ins></span> in <span
class="removed"><del><strong>the 500 most popular gratis Android
apps</a>.</p>
+
+ <p>The article should not have described</strong></del></span> these
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>proprietary</em></ins></span>
+ apps <span class="removed"><del><strong>as
+ “free”—they are not free software.</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>whose source code they cannot look
at.</em></ins></span> The <span class="removed"><del><strong>clear way to say
+ “zero price”</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>other apps might
+ be snooping in other ways.</p>
+
+ <p>This</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“gratis.”</p>
+
+ <p>The article takes for granted</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>evidence</em></ins></span> that <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>proprietary apps generally work against its
+ users. Android users must choose to use apps from</em></ins></span> the
<span class="removed"><del><strong>usual analytics tools are
+ legitimate, but is</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>free
+ software only <a href="https://f-droid.org/">F-Droid
store</a></em></ins></span>
+ that <span class="removed"><del><strong>valid? Software developers have
no right</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="https://f-droid.org/wiki/page/Antifeatures">
+ prominently warns the user if an app contains
+ anti-features</a>.</p>
+</li>
- <p>The article should</strong></del></span>
+<li>
+ <p>20 dishonest Android apps
+ recorded <a
href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/07/stealthy-google-play-apps-recorded-calls-and-stole-e-mails-and-texts">phone
+ calls and sent them and text messages and emails</em></ins></span> to
+ <span class="removed"><del><strong>analyze</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>snoopers</a>.</p>
- <p>Google did</em></ins></span> not <span
class="removed"><del><strong>have described</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>intend to make</em></ins></span> these apps <span
class="removed"><del><strong>as
- “free”—they are not free software. The clear
way</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>spy; on the contrary,
it
- worked in various ways</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>say
- “zero price” is “gratis.”</p>
-
- <p>The article takes</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>prevent that, and deleted these apps
+ <p>Google did not intend to make these apps spy; on the contrary, it
+ worked in various ways to prevent that, and deleted these apps
after discovering what they did. So we cannot blame Google
- specifically</em></ins></span> for <span
class="removed"><del><strong>granted that</strong></del></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>usual analytics tools</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>snooping of these apps.</p>
+ specifically for the snooping of these apps.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Google redistributes nonfree Android apps, and
therefore shares in the responsibility for the injustice of their
being nonfree. It also distributes its own nonfree apps, such as
Google
- Play, <a
href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html">which</em></ins></span>
- are
- <span class="removed"><del><strong>legitimate, but is that valid? Software
developers</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>malicious</a>.</p>
-
- <p>Could Google</em></ins></span> have <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>done a better job of preventing apps from
- cheating? There is</em></ins></span> no <span
class="removed"><del><strong>right</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>systematic way for Google, or Android
- users,</em></ins></span> to
- <span class="removed"><del><strong>analyze what</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>inspect executable proprietary apps to see what they
+ Play, <a
href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html">which
+ are malicious</a>.</p>
+
+ <p>Could Google have done a better job of preventing apps from
+ cheating? There is no systematic way for Google, or Android
+ users, to inspect executable proprietary apps to see what they
do.</p>
<p>Google could demand the source code for these apps, and study the
@@ -530,7 +548,7 @@
<p>The article takes for granted that the usual analytics tools are
legitimate, but is that valid? Software developers have no right to
- analyze what</em></ins></span> users are doing or how.
“Analytics” tools that snoop are
+ analyze</em></ins></span> what users are doing or how.
“Analytics” tools that snoop are
just as wrong as any other snooping.</p>
</li>
<li><p>Gratis Android apps (but not <a
href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a>)
@@ -1745,7 +1763,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2018/04/09 23:59:24 $
+$Date: 2018/04/22 16:29:01 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: proprietary-surveillance.ja.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-surveillance.ja.po,v
retrieving revision 1.194
retrieving revision 1.195
diff -u -b -r1.194 -r1.195
--- proprietary-surveillance.ja.po 9 Apr 2018 23:59:24 -0000 1.194
+++ proprietary-surveillance.ja.po 22 Apr 2018 16:29:01 -0000 1.195
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: proprietary-surveillance.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2018-04-09 23:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2018-04-22 16:25+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2017-01-24 12:16+0900\n"
"Last-Translator: NIIBE Yutaka <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Japanese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -657,6 +657,26 @@
#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
msgid ""
+"More than <a href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/16/child-";
+"apps-games-android-us-google-play-store-data-sharing-law-privacy\">50% of "
+"the 5,855 Android apps studied by researchers were found to snoop and "
+"collect information about its users</a>. 40% of the apps were found to "
+"insecurely snitch on its users. Furthermore, they could detect only some "
+"methods of snooping, in these proprietary apps whose source code they cannot "
+"look at. The other apps might be snooping in other ways."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
+msgid ""
+"This is evidence that proprietary apps generally work against its users. "
+"Android users must choose to use apps from the free software only <a href="
+"\"https://f-droid.org/\";>F-Droid store</a> that <a href=\"https://f-droid.";
+"org/wiki/page/Antifeatures\"> prominently warns the user if an app contains "
+"anti-features</a>."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
+msgid ""
"20 dishonest Android apps recorded <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/";
"information-technology/2017/07/stealthy-google-play-apps-recorded-calls-and-"
"stole-e-mails-and-texts\">phone calls and sent them and text messages and "
Index: proprietary-surveillance.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-surveillance.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.143
retrieving revision 1.144
diff -u -b -r1.143 -r1.144
--- proprietary-surveillance.pot 9 Apr 2018 23:59:24 -0000 1.143
+++ proprietary-surveillance.pot 22 Apr 2018 16:29:01 -0000 1.144
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: proprietary-surveillance.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2018-04-09 23:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2018-04-22 16:25+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -518,6 +518,26 @@
#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
msgid ""
+"More than <a "
+"href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/16/child-apps-games-android-us-google-play-store-data-sharing-law-privacy\";>50%
"
+"of the 5,855 Android apps studied by researchers were found to snoop and "
+"collect information about its users</a>. 40% of the apps were found to "
+"insecurely snitch on its users. Furthermore, they could detect only some "
+"methods of snooping, in these proprietary apps whose source code they cannot "
+"look at. The other apps might be snooping in other ways."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
+msgid ""
+"This is evidence that proprietary apps generally work against its "
+"users. Android users must choose to use apps from the free software only <a "
+"href=\"https://f-droid.org/\";>F-Droid store</a> that <a "
+"href=\"https://f-droid.org/wiki/page/Antifeatures\";> prominently warns the "
+"user if an app contains anti-features</a>."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
+msgid ""
"20 dishonest Android apps recorded <a "
"href=\"https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/07/stealthy-google-play-apps-recorded-calls-and-stole-e-mails-and-texts\";>phone
"
"calls and sent them and text messages and emails to snoopers</a>."
Index: proprietary-surveillance.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-surveillance.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.345
retrieving revision 1.346
diff -u -b -r1.345 -r1.346
--- proprietary-surveillance.ru.po 10 Apr 2018 11:01:42 -0000 1.345
+++ proprietary-surveillance.ru.po 22 Apr 2018 16:29:01 -0000 1.346
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: proprietary-surveillance.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2018-04-09 23:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2018-04-22 16:25+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2018-04-10 16:09+0000\n"
"Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2018-04-22 16:25+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid "Proprietary Surveillance - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation"
@@ -683,6 +684,26 @@
#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
msgid ""
+"More than <a href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/16/child-";
+"apps-games-android-us-google-play-store-data-sharing-law-privacy\">50% of "
+"the 5,855 Android apps studied by researchers were found to snoop and "
+"collect information about its users</a>. 40% of the apps were found to "
+"insecurely snitch on its users. Furthermore, they could detect only some "
+"methods of snooping, in these proprietary apps whose source code they cannot "
+"look at. The other apps might be snooping in other ways."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
+msgid ""
+"This is evidence that proprietary apps generally work against its users. "
+"Android users must choose to use apps from the free software only <a href="
+"\"https://f-droid.org/\";>F-Droid store</a> that <a href=\"https://f-droid.";
+"org/wiki/page/Antifeatures\"> prominently warns the user if an app contains "
+"anti-features</a>."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
+msgid ""
"20 dishonest Android apps recorded <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/";
"information-technology/2017/07/stealthy-google-play-apps-recorded-calls-and-"
"stole-e-mails-and-texts\">phone calls and sent them and text messages and "
- www/proprietary/po proprietary-surveillance.de....,
GNUN <=