[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Revert "Optimize vswap()"
From: |
Kirill Smelkov |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Revert "Optimize vswap()" |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:14:51 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 05:03:28PM +0100, grischka wrote:
[...]
> Compilation on Windows with MSC fails in tccgen.c:vswap():
> ../tccgen.c(476) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ';' before 'type'
> [more ...]
>
> After moving declarations before statements, it fails like this:
> ../tccgen.c(490) : warning C4308: negative integral constant converted to
> unsigned type
> ../tccgen.c(490) : warning C4307: '*' : integral constant overflow
> ../tccgen.c(490) : warning C4307: '+' : integral constant overflow
> ../tccgen.c:481: error: incompatible types for redefinition of
> '__static_assert_t'
> [more ...]
grischka! Could you please Cc relevant people when talking about
reverting their patches? I was unaware of this issue until recently.
Some of us read lists in batches through gmane...
> I'd suggest to move that optimization into its own function
> void memswap(void *p1, void *p2, size_t n);
For it to work effectively that memswap should be static inline and
contains test for n to be builtin constant and be more "ugly" in your
speak, and also that __builtin_constant() tests might not work out of
the box in tcc...
> or otherwise to revert it.
Maybe let's just do it step by step and fix _STATIC_ASSERT for win32?
Especially there is already one in
win32/include/malloc.h:#define _STATIC_ASSERT(expr) extern void
__static_assert_t(int [(expr)?1:-1])
#ifndef _MSVC
# define _STATIC_ASSERT // from ccan
#else
# define _STATIC_ASSERT // for msvc
#endif
?
Optimizing vswap() was an easy win and given tinycc goal is to be fast
compiler I suggest not to revert it.
On the other hand I have no microsoft compilers installation nor any
windows on my machines, and thus can't test how the code works/breaks there.
That _STATIC_ASSERT was taken from CCAN[1] which is valuable and quality
library for C.
No offences, but ruling out speedups on msvc non-standartness is not
wise imho.
I'm open to fixing it, just please cc me, and please provide advices
with msvc.
Thanks,
Kirill
[1] http://ccodearchive.net/
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, (continued)
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Roy Tam, 2013/01/10
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Akim Demaille, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Akim Demaille, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, grischka, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, grischka, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Revert "Optimize vswap()",
Kirill Smelkov <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Revert "Optimize vswap()", Roy Tam, 2013/01/15
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Revert "Optimize vswap()", grischka, 2013/01/15
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Revert "Optimize vswap()", grischka, 2013/01/15
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/01/16
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Michael Matz, 2013/01/16
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/01/17
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Domingo Alvarez Duarte, 2013/01/17
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, grischka, 2013/01/18
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Domingo Alvarez Duarte, 2013/01/18
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/01/24