texmacs-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others


From: David Allouche
Subject: Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 22:37:35 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i

On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 03:02:46PM +0200, David MENTRE wrote:
> Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Any way, Scheme is quite standardized as a language so it should
> > be very easy to adapt the tests (at least instructive to know whether
> > that is really the case ;^).
> 
> I have tried to adapt the tests for MZScheme and RScheme (in interpreter
> mode). Unfortunalty, this is not so easy because lots of features are
> not standardized (format, regex, hash table, threads, ...).
> 
> However, the compute intensive benches are more easier to adapt.
> 
> BTW, for RScheme, I haven't be able to find a correct documentation for
> the "format" expression. Apparently, format is not standardized in
> R5RS. Any good ref. doc. on Scheme?

The closest thing to a standard, useful, Scheme library:

http://srfi.schemers.org

Sadly, they seem to be having a DNS problem right now.

Note that all SRFI are not supported everywhere, and it seems that some
of them are widely considered as ill-conceived. Yet, that is still a
very useful resource.

Note also, that all supported SRFI resources may not be available
immediately in a Scheme implementation. For example, with guile you have
to import the relevant module.

-- 
                                                            -- ddaa




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]