[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others
From: |
David MENTRE |
Subject: |
Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others |
Date: |
Sun, 23 May 2004 15:02:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden> writes:
> Any way, Scheme is quite standardized as a language so it should
> be very easy to adapt the tests (at least instructive to know whether
> that is really the case ;^).
I have tried to adapt the tests for MZScheme and RScheme (in interpreter
mode). Unfortunalty, this is not so easy because lots of features are
not standardized (format, regex, hash table, threads, ...).
However, the compute intensive benches are more easier to adapt.
BTW, for RScheme, I haven't be able to find a correct documentation for
the "format" expression. Apparently, format is not standardized in
R5RS. Any good ref. doc. on Scheme?
Yours,
d.
--
David Mentré <address@hidden>
- [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, David MENTRE, 2004/05/22
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, David MENTRE, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, Joris van der Hoeven, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, David MENTRE, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others,
David MENTRE <=
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, Joris van der Hoeven, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, David Allouche, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, Joris van der Hoeven, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, Joris van der Hoeven, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, David MENTRE, 2004/05/23