Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Adding to the phpgw wiki...

[Izzy Blacklock]

On Sunday 23 Mar 2003 9:51 pm, Adam Hull wrote:
> You bring up some good points which reflect how this all came about. Lack
> of phpgroupware documentation is why the axis wiki was created. I set it up
> to be a place for people to "develop" docs for phpgw (and axisgw). The
> phpgw wiki is a new thing. So, think of the axis wiki as the developer docs
> site that you describe. If the docs don't exist in the axis wiki, chances
> are, they do not exist. But they are there for anyone to take, including
> the phpgw team to put into phpgroupware. And you're right, we should make
> this clearer for everyone because although our two projects have different
> names, we do work together. We just have slightly different focuses.

As I've learned.  My view of Axisgw has changed somewhat as my recent post in 
response to Dave shows.  I tend to like more openness then rigid policies, 
but recognize the need and benefits of both.  Having two projects that 
cooperate towards the achievement of the same goal, but differ on approach 
can be beneficial when done right.  I can't say that I know enough about 
Axisgw or it's relationship to phpgw to know if this is the case here.  I 
hope so.  

> Also, I think you have an unconventional definition of "fork". Forks
> typically mean incompatibility, so, I just want you to understand that
> axisgw is 100% compatible with phpgw.

My definition of fork is the same.  I just wasn't sure how different Axisgw is 
from phpgw.  Perhaps this should be spelled out.  I'll have to install Axis 
one of these days and take a look for myself.  

...Izzy