[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Drotek imu calibration problem
From: |
Chris |
Subject: |
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Drotek imu calibration problem |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:42:49 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4 |
Felix and anyone else who might know, i have one last question...
What ahrs subsystem is better for a fixed wing with bungee take off?
I used the float_dcm with 5g take off acceleration and it worked fine
everytime so it a safe bet
but i would like to try something new like "float_cmpl_rmat" also.
On the ground i tested
<subsystem name="ahrs" type="float_cmpl_rmat">
<define name="AHRS_USE_GPS_HEADING"/>
<define name="AHRS_GRAVITY_UPDATE_COORDINATED_TURN"/>
<define name="AHRS_GRAVITY_UPDATE_NORM_HEURISTIC"/>
</subsystem>
<define name="USE_AHRS_GPS_ACCELERATIONS"/>
<configure name="USE_MAGNETOMETER" value="1"/>
and it works very well especially the magnetometer.
The magnetometer looks very precise (i have calibrated it and set the
local magnetic field coefficients) when compared with a big navy compass
and it does not jitter so i can't imagine why i should not use it.
Is the float_cmpl_rmat code able to fuse both gps and magnetometer heading?
Also is the "USE_AHRS_GPS_ACCELERATIONS" definition active (used)
regardless of the AHRS subsystem used?
Thank you again for your help and time.
Chris
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Drotek imu calibration problem, (continued)
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Drotek imu calibration problem, Chris, 2013/04/07
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Drotek imu calibration problem, Tobias, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Drotek imu calibration problem, Chris, 2013/04/09
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Drotek imu calibration problem, Chris, 2013/04/10
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Drotek imu calibration problem, Chris, 2013/04/10
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Drotek imu calibration problem,
Chris <=