[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Mar 1998 05:36:10 -0500 (EST) |
> Yes. Many people complained that lynx shouldn't need to ask what the term
> was and setting an env variable was asking too much. It was a quick fix
> and should be revisited now that we are all older and wiser.
>
> > There is a thread on comp.editors now complaining that the vt100 causes
> > problems with vim, when it is used as the editor from lynx_386. There
> > are simple workarounds, but I never understood why a TERM variable
> > should be hardcoded in (and not overridden by a TERM environment
> > variable).
I saw the comp.editors thread...
vt100's still better than vim's hardcoding "vt52" for the same environment
(there's absolutely _no_ way that could be correct).
> > Doug
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Wayne Buttles, 1998/02/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Benjamin C. W. Sittler, 1998/02/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/01
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Jason F. McBrayer, 1998/03/01
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/01
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Doug Kaufman, 1998/03/01
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Wayne Buttles, 1998/03/01
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version,
T.E.Dickey <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Doug Kaufman, 1998/03/02
Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Jason F. McBrayer, 1998/03/01