[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Configure patch for SCO
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Configure patch for SCO |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Sep 1997 20:19:26 -0400 (EDT) |
> T.E.Dickey wrote:
>
> > I don't think that I have access to any machines with a -lmalloc at the
> > moment (that's just taken from Makefile.old, to cover whatever configuration
> > it was originally added for).
>
> It should be sufficient to see if a trivial program compiles
> successfully with -lmalloc. If not, no such library exists, so don't
> try to link the final binary with it!
some linkers lie in various interesting ways, so I'd rather know a little
about the library (what externals it's likely to provide) to narrow things
down. (That's pretty much what the autoconf author decided too, since the
check for a library w/o an entrypoint is marked as an obsolete feature).
> > > > # It's a little late to do much, but try to warn user if he's
> > > > using
> > > > # SCO's cc (which is reported to have broken const/volatile).
> > >
> > > If there are problems that affect Lynx, they can be configure-tested...
> > I suppose so - if I know what the symptoms are (the comment was based
> > on email from you, where you recommended using either rcc or gcc because
> > of problems with const/volatile). I've only built with cc, so I'm not
> > sure what problems there might be (at least it does _compile_ and _run_,
> > though there may indeed be runtime problems that I don't encounter with
> > my short tests).
>
> Ah, jeeze... now I forget whether I was just forwarding information from
> an even older Lynx makefile, or if I'd actually had problems myself.
> Can you forward me that old message of mine (if you still have it)...?
Here's a piece from April 26 (I don't see the original around - I try to
delete things when I've got them addressed, though I have thousands of
messages to go ;-)
> You can also figure out gcc vs. rcc, on 3.2v4.2: use gcc if available,
> else rcc. On OSR5 I recommend you use cc only (user will override if
he
> prefers gcc).
But I don't see the remark about 'const'/'volatile' -- sorry.
> >Bela<
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- Re: LYNX-DEV Configure patch for SCO, (continued)
- Re: LYNX-DEV Configure patch for SCO, Jean-Pierre Radley, 1997/09/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV Configure patch for SCO, T.E.Dickey, 1997/09/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV Configure patch for SCO, Klaus Weide, 1997/09/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV Configure patch for SCO, Jean-Pierre Radley, 1997/09/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV Configure patch for SCO, T.E.Dickey, 1997/09/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV Configure patch for SCO, Jonathan Sergent, 1997/09/28
Re: LYNX-DEV Configure patch for SCO, T.E.Dickey, 1997/09/28
Re: LYNX-DEV Configure patch for SCO, Nelson Henry Eric, 1997/09/28
Re: LYNX-DEV Configure patch for SCO, Bela Lubkin, 1997/09/29
- Re: LYNX-DEV Configure patch for SCO,
T.E.Dickey <=