[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Configure patch for SCO
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Configure patch for SCO |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Sep 1997 21:45:10 -0400 (EDT) |
> What that seems to me is contrary to the way almost any other public-domain
> program is distributed. Elm, mutt, pine, wu-ftpd, less, gcc, groff, xv,
> ghostscript, inn, mawk, -- I could go on--, all of them unpack each new
> version into a directory whose name clearly reflects the new version number.
true - but those are _release_ versions (both Klaus & Fote seem to prefer
this approach). I build directories with names that correspond to versions
myself - since it makes generating patches more reliable -- but use my
directory editor. If one's using shell/command line tools, one tends to
use simpler approaches...
> Jean-Pierre Radley address@hidden XC/XT Custodian Sysop, CompuServe
> SCOForum
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
Re: LYNX-DEV Configure patch for SCO, Nelson Henry Eric, 1997/09/28
Re: LYNX-DEV Configure patch for SCO, Bela Lubkin, 1997/09/29