[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Update on SSL and Lynx
From: |
Al Gilman |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Update on SSL and Lynx |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Dec 1996 08:28:44 -0500 (EST) |
What we recently worked out to say in the FAQ on this point is:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
US Export laws and regulations introduce impediments to the inclusion
of security support in the general distributions of a freeware WWW
client such as Lynx.
[1]Tom Zerucha <address@hidden> has two ways to add SSL capability to
your Lynx installation, as Lynx patches or via a proxy. He says:
For now, If someone [2]emails me stating they are a US or Canadian
citizen in the US or Canada, and promises not to redistribute it, I
will send them the source to my proxy or the patches. A PGP key is
preferred, though the request itself need not be encrypted.
The only reason I am asking for a promise not to redistribute (and
not even making it a licensing term) is that they may be illegal
under ITAR. What I should say (and actually intend) is distribute
at your own risk, but I can't :). I couldn't suggest to people
that they should drive over 55 until this year either.
Theoretically the code to either the proxy or the patches is
protected as free speech under the first amendment, and the
prohibition of "hooks" is too vague to stand up in court. The code
contains no actual crypto, only "hooks" to something that does.
I am not a lawyer; this is my layman's understanding of the
situation. Ask a real lawyer for a real opinion.
For more information
start here:[3] [>O-au<]
(lynx enhanced gold key on envelope)
Back to [4] Al's picks from the lynx-dev discussion.
References
1. finger://address@hidden/
2. mailto:address@hidden
3. http://www.privacy.org/ipc
4. http://www.access.digex.net/~asgilman/lynx/FAQ/Als_picks.html
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- LYNX-DEV Update on SSL and Lynx, Subir Grewal, 1996/12/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV Update on SSL and Lynx,
Al Gilman <=
- LYNX-DEV SSL, Lynx & US Law, Philip Webb, 1996/12/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV SSL, Lynx & US Law, Michael Richardson, 1996/12/08
- LYNX-DEV SSL, Lynx & US Law, Philip Webb, 1996/12/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV SSL, Lynx & US Law, Michael Richardson, 1996/12/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV SSL, Lynx & US Law, Tom Zerucha, 1996/12/09
Re: LYNX-DEV Update on SSL and Lynx, Tom Zerucha, 1996/12/09
Re: LYNX-DEV Update on SSL and Lynx, Michael Richardson, 1996/12/12