Re: [lwip-devel] Mercurial

[address@hidden]

David Woodhouse wrote:
> Same as CVS really. Life's too short to go learning every new version
> control system, especially given that people seem to invent new ones so
> often.
>
> I've often just avoided working with a project based on its choice of
> version control -- if lwip had been in Mercurial I wouldn't have tried
> it. Life's just too short. Not that my contributions so far have been
> massive, mind you.
>   
Same with me. I have been able to avoid anyhing except CVS and SVN so 
far. Not that I am strictly against mercurial (or git), but although I 
hate the idealistic discussion about different versioning systems nearly 
as much as I hate the discussion about the best OS, I fear we risk 
'loosing' new users if we change to a version system that isn't as 
widespread as CVS or SVN (sorry to offend linux hackers ;-).
> Git does the job, well. It took a while to get Windows support, but even
>   
Hey, does anyone talk about MacOS -> GUI??

Although CVS is definitively not my first decision, I'd rather stick to 
it unless there's a real reason to change it (or we all want to change 
to the same).


Simon