Re: [lwip-devel] Mercurial

[Alain M.]

By mere chance, I got this from kicad list:

http://betterexplained.com/articles/intro-to-distributed-version-control-illustrated/

At the bottom of the page, Linus Torvalds says that Mercurial is the 
only "not too bad" alternative, but that it is not relyable (1 hour 
video, very interesting)

Alain

Jonathan Larmour escreveu:
> Mike Kleshov wrote:
> > I would prefer Mercurial as well.
> > I think developers with write access won't have any difficulty
> > adapting to Mercurial. But those who only want to check out the latest
> > development version might find it more difficult.
>
> Belatedly, I'll just mention me too, SVN is fine too (but not 
> distributed) but without consensus I guess CVS will do. I dislike git, 
> and although I don't use Windows, its Windows support is very poor and I 
> suspect that would disenfranchise a lot of lwIP users.
>
> If this discussion comes up again, this may be useful: 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_revision_control_software
>
> Jifl