[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Certain accidentals
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: Certain accidentals |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:41:38 +0200 |
Hi Brian,
2014-04-18 8:26 GMT+02:00 Brian Barker <address@hidden>:
> But perhaps you are referring to the method of textual input in Lilypond,
> where notes that are named "sharp" or "flat" need to be qualified as such,
> notwithstanding what the \key indication would appear already to imply. (In
> this way, Lilypond operates somewhat counterintuitively and against normal
> musical thinking.)
seriously?
"against normal musical thinking"??
Look at the output of
{ \key g\major g''2. fis''4 g''1 }
Do you really _think_ g f g while playing/singing?
Can't believe that.
Imho, it's the opposite, printing fis from { \key g\major f''4 } would
be counterintuitively.
Well, it can be more typing, I don't want it different, though.
Cheers,
Harm
- Certain accidentals, a.l.f.r.e.d.o, 2014/04/17
- Message not available
- Re: Certain accidentals, Brian Barker, 2014/04/18
- Re: Certain accidentals, Urs Liska, 2014/04/18
- Re: Certain accidentals, Brian Barker, 2014/04/18
- Re: Certain accidentals, Paul Morris, 2014/04/18
- Re: Certain accidentals, David Kastrup, 2014/04/19
- Re: Certain accidentals, Christ van Willegen, 2014/04/19