[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Prefer luatex for documentation

From: Jean Abou Samra
Subject: Re: Prefer luatex for documentation
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 17:01:11 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0

Le 23/11/2022 à 22:52, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
Le 22/11/2022 à 22:57, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
OK, I'll do a one-core test.


real    29m37,883s
user    28m28,375s
sys    2m9,725s


real    30m42,967s
user    29m14,973s
sys    2m31,694s

This is with a single core, in the same configuration as in CI
(with --ci passed to, implying the use of the GS API,
and without extractpdfmark).

As you can see, the difference is noticeable but not worrisome.

What is the state of this discussion? Werner, what is your
opinion on using LuaTeX exclusively now that this point
has been cleared up?


Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]